I know some very smart normies and conservatives who would rather be persuaded to join the circus than read Q posts. They have mental road blocks, such as the fear of judgement by their spouses or peers.
So that's the challenge. I want to develop a strategy for cracking the toughest cookies. I don't mean dogmatic libs; they're lost for now. I mean someone who is rational and respects you enough to allow a 20 minute sales pitch but will only give you one shot.
So it would have to be a simple and strong argument or proof, yet still within the city limits of Normietown. This means no Angela Hitler, no locking up Obama and Hillary in Gitmo, no Satanic pedos.
I'm thinking I would start by explaining that Q is a propaganda campaign by Military Intelligence to undermine the criminality of the Clintons, Obama, and the deep state. I think many normies can accept that. Then I'd move on to some juicy FISA gate posts. Or a personal favorite: Blunt and Direct Time. The Lord's Prayer is also a good one.
Let me know your ideas on which normie-friendly proofs or arguments you think are the strongest to start with.
Believing in Q is more than just "look there, see that". It is the culmination of seeing so many "coincidences" that Q existing becomes obvious. Autists pick up on the coincidences and see connections. Normies may not.
https://qalerts.app/?q=how+many+coincidences
I don't necessarily trust Q, but I do trust Trump. Over and over again there are just too many "coincidences" between what Trump and Q say and the timing, never mind Trump's affinity for making Qs in the air with his finger.
There was a “Dark to Light, Q nod” that Trump did too, that was harder decode