I can't help but to think of this being referenced in Revelation 16:1:
1.And I heard a great voice out of the temple saying to the seven angels, Go your ways, and pour out the vials of the wrath of God upon the earth.
2.(1) And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a bad and evil (+) sore upon the men, which had the (2) mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image.
(1) The history of the first Angel, whose plague upon the earth, is described almost in the same words with that sixth plague of the Egyptians in Exodus 9:9 . But it doeth signify a spiritual ulcer, and that torture or butchery of conscience seared with a hot iron, which accuseth the ungodly within, and both by truth of the word (the light whereof God hath now so long shewed forth) and by bitterness stirreth up and forceth out the sword of God's wrath.
(+) This was like the sixth plague of Egypt, which was sores and boils or pocks; and this reigneth commonly among Canons, monks, friars, nuns, Priests and such filthy vermin which bear the mark of the beast.
(2) See Revelation 13:16
3.(3)And the second angel poured out his vial upon the sea; and it (a) became as the (+) blood of (♣) a dead man: and every living life died in the sea.
(3)The history of the second Angel, who troubleth and molesteth the seas, that he may stir up the conscience of men sleeping in their wickedness; Revelation 8:8 .
(a) It was turned into rotten and filthy blood, such as is in dead bodies.
(+) This is like to the first plague of Egypt which signifieth all kinds of pestilences and contagious diseases.
(♣) That is, corrupt and infected. Is this the undead? Like the walking dead?
I find it provocative that of all the terms, it is the word -- "vial" that is repeatedly used in Revelation.
The actual Greek word used in those verses is phiale, which is a shallow bowl that was used in Greek and Roman religious worship.
https://biblehub.com/greek/strongs_5357.htm
https://biblehub.com/revelation/16-1.htm
Yes, you are correct. However you are not recognizing phiálē the English and modern meaning of it. In the Greek,the word φιάλη phiálē is indeed a broad shallow cup ("phial"):—vial.
In Middle English (1300–50) viole, is a variant of fiole phial, which is the modern word 'vial'.
The word has become to mean something used in a scientific setting. If Revelation is of a time to come, then why wouldn't the word phiálē (vial) be the same? The English word, 'vial' used in this verse is widely recognized.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm doing because the Bible was not written in English or for modern audiences. I am deferring to the original language rather than translator bias.
Very well. We can call it a "shallow bowl". However, it doesn't really change anything.
1.And I heard a great voice out of the temple saying to the seven angels, Go your ways, and pour out the
vialsshallow bowl of the wrath of God upon the earth.2.(1) And the first went, and poured out his
vialsshallow bowl upon the earth; and there fell a bad and evil (+) sore upon the men, which had the (2) mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image.Using
vialsshallow bowl doesn't affect the meaning because the modern use of vial is categorically similar. The etymology is indeed always important, so you raise a good point.Plague upon the earth. I know that bubonic plague was one of the horrible diseases the Ukrainian labs were working on. In history, that particular one was extremely effective at wiping out populations. I believe that (((they))) are salivating at the thought of a Plague outbreak, given the history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bubonic_plague
However, that particular doozy is mitigated by proper sanitation and flea eradication - oh and not letting rat populations explode. So even though there have been outbreaks of that plague in modern times, it hasn't taken hold.
Well, here is the problem with their 'anything' pandemic:
Today, the most prevalent cause of disease is from environmental chemical toxins that attack the neurological system and cause cancer and auto-immune diseases, et. al. In 2002, Dr. Tom Mack of USC stated --
Mack then stated --
Until now, of course.
Good Sanitation, Hygiene, and Nutrition Prevent Pandemics From Ever Happening
Common diseases of the early part of the last Century were caused from the lack of sanitation and nutrition. It was a sanitation and hygiene issue. The prevalence of animal husbandry, the reliance of domesticated animals for travel, the lack of sanitation infrastructure, hygiene, and good nutrition contributed to widespread diseases. Often the drinking water was taken from the same source as human and animal waste went into. The streets were covered in animal fecal matter. It was tracked in doors and it was everywhere. The vast majority of diseases were spread through fecal matter.
While smallpox captured the imagination with its high death rate and gross manifestations on victims' bodies, less obvious infections claimed even more lives. For example, eighteenth-century Philadelphians drank water contaminated with fecal matter, which resulted in endemic typhoid, dysentery, and other intestinal diseases. Since polio was primarily transmitted in fecal matter, by simply improving sanitation infrastructure reduced the occurrence of polio cases.
The increasing establishment of modern sanitation infrastructure, treated drinking water, and improved nutrition was the single most important reason why common diseases in America decreased dramatically beginning in the early part of the 20th century. By the 1950s and 1960s, the United States had the most modern and advanced sanitation infrastructure in the world. Disease precipitously dropped as a result. It was never the vaccines as the CDC and FDA claim that caused the drop in common diseases. They are committing fraud. It's all a damn lie. It can be easily shown, it was the improvement and expansion of sanitation infrastructure that best correlates with the decrease of common diseases. If anything, the vaccines retarded the drop of common diseases when they were introduced after the decrease had already started.
Good sanitation, good hygiene, and good nutrition is infinitely better at preventing disease than any and all vaccines ever invented.
Each individual has an extraordinary unique immune system with different genetics and very different environmental experiences. The strategy for defense is remarkably different for each individual. If one ever wonders why one individual has a deadly adverse reaction to a vaccine or to an allopathic therapeutic and the next person doesn't, it is for this reason.
Each of our immune systems are very different and to treat us all as one boiler plate production as pharmaceutical companies do, is incredibly naive and dangerous. And the tragic statistics for adverse reactions as a result of prescription drugs and vaccines verifies each individual is indeed uniquely different. Each of us have a unique 'bio-Individual' immune system.
With all life-forms, there is an innate self-preservation for survival. This means pathogens weaken in strength as they spread. In regards to the pathogen, it is beneficial to the parasite for its host to live as long as possible for its reproductive self-preservation. At the same time this occurs, humans and their individual immune systems are learning to defend against the pathogen. As the pathogen spreads, it will become inert. This is because of bio-individual immunity. Each individual has about 380 trillion viruses and 38 trillion bacteria in their body at any given time. The human virome is the total collection of viruses in and on the human body. The human body contains trillions of microorganisms — outnumbering human cells by 10 to 1.
There is no such thing as 'herd immunity'. This is a 'synthetic' man-made idea.
"Herd Immunity" was invented in the veterinary field. Livestock owners bought the concept up without any question. The marketing departments in the Vaccine industry decided to adopt this term to promote vaccines for humans. To the vaccine companies, we are nothing more than 'cash cows' as part of the livestock herd.
Those currently proposing forced vaccination laws point to a U.S. Supreme Court decision from 1905: Jacobson v. Massachusetts. In fact, the Supreme Court has not heard a compulsory vaccine case since the 1920s, until recently.
In the 1905 decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, The opinion was written by chief justice, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
Attorney Emord looks at the history of compulsory vaccination, and shows how it was Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. who stripped away 14th Amendment rights in regards to compulsory vaccination, the very same judge who ruled in favor of forced sterilization which was supported by the “science” of that day, eugenics. Eugenics is the same “science” used by the Nazis in Germany to endorse eliminating “feeble-minded” people in favor of a “master race.”
The CDC was never created for protecting the American people against disease. It has ALWAYS been, ab initio based on eugenics.