Which Pentagon official? Oh, speaking on condition of anonymity? So "anonymous sources?" From "@OsintUpdates"?
Yeah... I'd be the first one the leftists would call a "tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist" but this kind of stuff only gives weight to that claim. The whole reason they can't get the label to stick is because we've been so good at policing ourselves and not allowing this kind of clickbaity fake news to gain traction.
Fake until you get actual people coming forth with this information and/or endorsing it... BUT I would agree that they do look like they could be closely related. If you're trying to plant that idea in peoples' heads then good, but don't do it in a clickbaity tabloid fashion IMHO.
Agreed. There needs to be at least some fashion of proof to these claims for it to be relevant, and "anonymous officials" are worth as much when we say it as when the mainstream media says it.
Which Pentagon official? Oh, speaking on condition of anonymity? So "anonymous sources?" From "@OsintUpdates"?
Yeah... I'd be the first one the leftists would call a "tinfoil hat conspiracy theorist" but this kind of stuff only gives weight to that claim. The whole reason they can't get the label to stick is because we've been so good at policing ourselves and not allowing this kind of clickbaity fake news to gain traction.
Fake until you get actual people coming forth with this information and/or endorsing it... BUT I would agree that they do look like they could be closely related. If you're trying to plant that idea in peoples' heads then good, but don't do it in a clickbaity tabloid fashion IMHO.
Agreed. There needs to be at least some fashion of proof to these claims for it to be relevant, and "anonymous officials" are worth as much when we say it as when the mainstream media says it.
This comment is one of a couple that matters in this thread. Thanks for your objection friend