How Tucker Is Proving The Jan 6th Committee Are Lying. This Should Be Automatic Arrests of Them for Treason, as They Lied Under Oath and Recorded It!
🚔 Crime & Democrats 💸
Tucker on an exclusive with Glenn Beck today, someone posted on Truth, off GWP. This should clearly give the US Marshals the ability to automatically arrest the Jan 6th committee, charge them with Treason, and free all the Jan 6th prisoners! Tucker details to Glenn how his they learned how and what they lied about on Jan. 6th. And theses idiots lied and recorded the lie under oath, never erasing or deleting what they watched! Why?! Because they never thought they’d get caught.
Gee, don't you think that your reactive response here is a bit polarized and over-the-top?
Are there only two options? That one must take the view that Tucker Carlson's current direction stinks to high heaven or otherwise, just be asleep, not question, always takes things at their face value and not try to understand things?
Don't answer. It's a rhetorical question.
I think the nature of your response is really interesting, potentially, for you, if you care to examine it.
But like DJT had to finally do when idiot media kept pestering him and demanding that he 'denounce white supremacy', I'll respond:
Resist taking things at face value, make plenty of effort to reflect on all the information and apply logical thinking. Question what people are doing, on both sides of the war, but also pay attention to your own emotional reactions. Beware of your own biases and blind spots, recognize that you inherently have blind spots and develop the ability to entertain a variety of potential explanations for surface activity and behaviors by actors around you.
Have a nice day!
Don't answer, it's rhetorical? Well, your rhetoric is both officious and insulting. And since you were so condescending to offer a stranger personal advice, may I return the favor? Obvious efforts to be pedantic generally end up being gobbledygook.
Hey, thanks for the favor.
Note: occasionally, I come across someone who finds my particular style to be... well, as you say, 'officious'. It's certainly true that I can be pedantic sometimes. My writing style, not to mention thinking style, occasionally rubs some people the wrong way. Some people experience it as condescending, but I don't have a problem with that. There are enough people who find my particular writing style eloquent, insightful, helpful, articulate, inspirational even. They are the people I write for. Not everyone needs to like it.
I'm not sure why, but it seems like me challenging your particular argument and way of thinking (as expressed in your comment) triggered a pretty strong reaction. I wouldn't sweat it. We don't need to agree on everything. What's really important is that we agree, by and large, on why we are here.
If my comment didn't help you or benefit you, well, I'm sad. But maybe it contributed to others who read it.
Either way, have a good day.
Edit: PS. What I wrote as "Resist taking things at face value..... by actors around you", well, that certainly applies to me as well. To any and all anons, I think. But I only really offered it because you seemed to be asking (or even suggesting) that I was telling you what to do, as in be a sleepy sheep, or whatevs. I RESPONDED to you. Maybe you should look at what YOU wrote as a starting point for looking at what I wrote in response.
But either way, either way, thanks for the favor and the advice!
PPS. If you wish to discuss further, I'm open to that. Btw, "don't answer" wasn't meant to shut you down. But I do think you're overreacting to what are essentially text messages over the net. Text is really very poor at communicating a LOT of things that are very important to real human communication. As such, it's also often liable to misinterpretation. But both you and I know that, right?
I think I'd better cease and desist here....