A lot you you guys saying that “everybody took pictures with him” are completely missing the point here. You have this outrageous mascot parading all over the place, of course people are going to get pictures with him. But now apply geolocation tracking that we know they used to arrest other J6ers, and all of these people have photo confirmations of their identities on their phones/social media. Geolocation alone would be circumstantial. Geolocation + ID is a slam dunk. He was bait, and 978+ people took it.
Not sure who the "he" is that you're talking about, but the folks talking about pictures are saying that JC having a picture with the Ukrainian operative doesn't mean zilch.
Otherwise, are people misreading what you are attempting to say by mosting your subject line and this picture of the (known) ukrainian operative?
From a critical perspective, your post title/picture really fails to indicate what you are saying in this comment here. If that was your main point, you could have made it a LOT clearer.
On that note, it's an interesting theory, and worthy of contention, but how evidence based is it? Is there any evidence that people's selfies with JC are the key or partial data used by the corrupt establishment to prosecute?
Pretty sure people would have taken heaps and heaps of selfies that day, and that corrupt authorities could easily have gotten access to such info.
A lot you you guys saying that “everybody took pictures with him” are completely missing the point here. You have this outrageous mascot parading all over the place, of course people are going to get pictures with him. But now apply geolocation tracking that we know they used to arrest other J6ers, and all of these people have photo confirmations of their identities on their phones/social media. Geolocation alone would be circumstantial. Geolocation + ID is a slam dunk. He was bait, and 978+ people took it.
Not sure who the "he" is that you're talking about, but the folks talking about pictures are saying that JC having a picture with the Ukrainian operative doesn't mean zilch.
Otherwise, are people misreading what you are attempting to say by mosting your subject line and this picture of the (known) ukrainian operative?
From a critical perspective, your post title/picture really fails to indicate what you are saying in this comment here. If that was your main point, you could have made it a LOT clearer.
On that note, it's an interesting theory, and worthy of contention, but how evidence based is it? Is there any evidence that people's selfies with JC are the key or partial data used by the corrupt establishment to prosecute?
Pretty sure people would have taken heaps and heaps of selfies that day, and that corrupt authorities could easily have gotten access to such info.
He was reported to be a crisis actor early on. At least here on GAW and PDW within a day or two after J6.