What is the real purpose of Silicon Valley Community Foundation and Bank?
Who has been discussing them for years?
How do they control industries and communities? Who picks winners and losers? How are tech companies and oligopolies accountable and able to operate without profitability? How are big banks able to operate beyond their assets? Who funds the bailouts? What is centralized digital currency? Why are people in Chicago being paid to do nothing? Why are people in Racine, Wisconsin being paid for their vaccines and boosters? What did the lockdowns provide? What did the COVID payments provide?
This is closely orchestrated.
Same with the J6 exposure. Same with the Ukraine escalation.
Why are they still pushing COVID vaccines?
Why did nothing happen regarding the elections?
What have insiders known for years? What really happened in 2008?
What is the Freemason motto?
What business did Sam Johnson claim he should have focused on and why?
Why will no media dare touch the story of Racine, including its connections with Silicon Valley Community Foundation and Bank?
Who did Bill Biggerstaff meet with during his time in Racine, Wisconsin?
What foundation controls Racine?
Who controls the the largest privately held, family-owned financial services company in Wisconsin?
Now answer your own questions with links. Thanks. Why else do we have this site? So you can play Socrates with everyone? You're not Q. Pony up or shut up.
Nobody is saying it isn't the truth. We're just saying we don't know what you're talking about and we have lives outside this board. Families and jobs and kids to take to soccer games. If you care about the truth, share it openly. Show us where we can verify it so we can all benefit. Or keep this schtick going, I don't care. Your Racine posts have become droll and few of us care anymore.
What's special about Racine? Even if a bunch of powerful people have met in Racine, I'm sure they have all met in a different location as well.
Monte Rio, California is the root! Why do you think Bohemian Grove is located there? Could it be the center of trafficking? What is trafficking? What road do you have to go down to get to Monte Rio, California? I-80 West? Is there a lot of traffic there? West... what about all the noise Kanye West has been making recently? Could it have something to do with Monte Rio, the center of the Bohemian Grove?
See I can do the same stuff with a somewhat random location. I respect what you're doing and I'm sure you're looking for the truth, but powerful people can exist and comingle outside of Racine. Racine does not have to be their Mecca.
Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in?
What can you tell us about what's happening now?
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
1. Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse. Mainly because, credit unions are owned and control by YOU. Who is their known local/domestic members/clients. When you open an account at any credit union. You're automatically an owner. And have control over your credit union. In comparison, banks are often owned by anonynous/secret owners. Including foreign owners. As clients, you have zero control over banks.
2. Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers.
In summary: 1. Payer Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Payee Cash (Beneficiary).
The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Looks And Smells Fishy?
Shortly after the above, WF called one of the owner directly. Which is very unusual. WF expressed their "concern". They said that those withdraw transactions. Which were legal and there was nothing wrong with them. In other words, they were as agreed on. But still, WF were really concern. More of 75% of the call was somehow about WF expressing their many "concerns" in different terms. This is very also unusual. Because WF never before called them about past withdraw transactions approved by WF themselves. This looks fishy and smells fishy. When asked what was their concern? Or if they had any concerns? WF did NOT answer. They change subject. When asked again, WF came across as upset and very defensive. As if a question was a personal attack, LOL ;) Yeah right. Then WF change subject again. The total of those transactions was significant. But they did approve them, and they confirmed that they were lawful. So why are they "concern" about withdraws? WF also asked, in the future, to withdraw "less" money. The owners, politely reminded WF that, as agreed on, they are fully free to withdraw part of or all their money.
My instinct tells me that WF is presently too short on cash for their liking. They KNOW about an increasing risk. Which they do not want their clients to know about. But this is just my instinct speculating.
Same Risk With Deutsche Bank
I heard similar stories about Deutsche Bank. Many of their largest clients are presently moving their cash out. For those not familiar with Deutsche Bank, it is the 8th largest bank in Europe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
The largest bank in Europe is HSBC Holdings PLC, UK. Which was allegedly created to primarily do illegal money laundering for people with Evil behaviors. My instinct tells me that for people with Good behaviors, HSBC is by far the most risky bank to do business with and store cash at.
/u/TrustTheTruth Silicon Valley Bank fails on the same day Wells Fargo customers appear to be victims of a bail in?
What can you tell us about what's happening now?
What is the real purpose of Silicon Valley Community Foundation and Bank?
Who has been discussing them for years?
How do they control industries and communities? Who picks winners and losers? How are tech companies and oligopolies accountable and able to operate without profitability? How are big banks able to operate beyond their assets? Who funds the bailouts? What is centralized digital currency? Why are people in Chicago being paid to do nothing? Why are people in Racine, Wisconsin being paid for their vaccines and boosters? What did the lockdowns provide? What did the COVID payments provide?
This is closely orchestrated.
Same with the J6 exposure. Same with the Ukraine escalation.
Why are they still pushing COVID vaccines?
Why did nothing happen regarding the elections?
What have insiders known for years? What really happened in 2008?
What is the Freemason motto?
What business did Sam Johnson claim he should have focused on and why?
Why will no media dare touch the story of Racine, including its connections with Silicon Valley Community Foundation and Bank?
Who did Bill Biggerstaff meet with during his time in Racine, Wisconsin?
What foundation controls Racine?
Who controls the the largest privately held, family-owned financial services company in Wisconsin?
Who controls Tech Prize in Racine, Wisconsin?
https://tech-prize.org/about/
What is the role of Foxconn Industrial Internet? What is Wisconn Valley?
All about that root
All of the global elite know the significance of Racine.
One Word exposes everything. It is what they fear most.
Trust, what's the deal with Trump? I've seen you mention that he knows all about Racine.
Do you think he's fighting against the root?
Now answer your own questions with links. Thanks. Why else do we have this site? So you can play Socrates with everyone? You're not Q. Pony up or shut up.
Nobody is saying it isn't the truth. We're just saying we don't know what you're talking about and we have lives outside this board. Families and jobs and kids to take to soccer games. If you care about the truth, share it openly. Show us where we can verify it so we can all benefit. Or keep this schtick going, I don't care. Your Racine posts have become droll and few of us care anymore.
What's special about Racine? Even if a bunch of powerful people have met in Racine, I'm sure they have all met in a different location as well.
Monte Rio, California is the root! Why do you think Bohemian Grove is located there? Could it be the center of trafficking? What is trafficking? What road do you have to go down to get to Monte Rio, California? I-80 West? Is there a lot of traffic there? West... what about all the noise Kanye West has been making recently? Could it have something to do with Monte Rio, the center of the Bohemian Grove?
See I can do the same stuff with a somewhat random location. I respect what you're doing and I'm sure you're looking for the truth, but powerful people can exist and comingle outside of Racine. Racine does not have to be their Mecca.
I can confirm something unusual is presently happening at Wells Fargo (WF). A financial team at a business I know recommended those two things to their owners:
1. Moved Cash OUT of WF
Last week, they recommended moving most of their corporation's cash OUT from all their WF accounts. Their recommendation was approved. The same day, all owners unanimously approved and moved more than 90% of their cash OUT of WF. They choose to move their cash to one of their local credit union. The keywords here is "credit union". Because in comparison to bank, credit union have a much lower risk of being affected during a potential financial collapse. Mainly because, credit unions are owned and control by YOU. Who is their known local/domestic members/clients. When you open an account at any credit union. You're automatically an owner. And have control over your credit union. In comparison, banks are often owned by anonynous/secret owners. Including foreign owners. As clients, you have zero control over banks.
2. Moved Cash AROUND WF
Starting this week, permanently stop sending cash through WF. Instead, use alternative lawful financial institutions. This second recommendation was also approved. They reduced by 90% the cash they send through WF. By "sending cash through" through, I mean their transactions such as, but not limited to, both domestic and international transfers. In other words, stop using WF as an intermediary bank for exchanges or foreign exchanges. Instead, they use lawful decentralized crypto transfers. In summary: 1. Payer Cash ---> 2. Decentralized Crypto ---> 3. Payee Cash (Beneficiary). The keyword here is "Decentralized".
Looks And Smells Fishy?
Shortly after the above, WF called one of the owner directly. Which is very unusual. WF expressed their "concern". They said that those withdraw transactions. Which were legal and there was nothing wrong with them. In other words, they were as agreed on. But still, WF were really concern. More of 75% of the call was somehow about WF expressing their many "concerns" in different terms. This is very also unusual. Because WF never before called them about past withdraw transactions approved by WF themselves. This looks fishy and smells fishy. When asked what was their concern? Or if they had any concerns? WF did NOT answer. They change subject. When asked again, WF came across as upset and very defensive. As if a question was a personal attack, LOL ;) Yeah right. Then WF change subject again. The total of those transactions was significant. But they did approve them, and they confirmed that they were lawful. So why are they "concern" about withdraws? WF also asked, in the future, to withdraw "less" money. The owners, politely reminded WF that, as agreed on, they are fully free to withdraw part of or all their money.
My instinct tells me that WF is presently too short on cash for their liking. They KNOW about an increasing risk. Which they do not want their clients to know about. But this is just my instinct speculating.
Same Risk With Deutsche Bank
I heard similar stories about Deutsche Bank. Many of their largest clients are presently moving their cash out. For those not familiar with Deutsche Bank, it is the 8th largest bank in Europe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
The largest bank in Europe is HSBC Holdings PLC, UK. Which was allegedly created to primarily do illegal money laundering for people with Evil behaviors. My instinct tells me that for people with Good behaviors, HSBC is by far the most risky bank to do business with and store cash at.
Source about the ranking at:
https://www.insiderintelligence.com/insights/largest-banks-europe-list/
https://archive.ph/Xs9AN#selection-999.0-1301.41
Lots of sources about HSBC's alleged money laundering:
https://archive.md/bYVmQ#selection-4519.0-4775.5
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSBC#Controversies