An Ivermectin Influencer Died. Now His Followers Are Worried About Their Own 'Severe' Symptoms.
(www.vice.com)
🤢 MSM SCUMBAGS 🤢
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (86)
sorted by:
Not a worry, done it many times in the backwoods on backpacking trips. But long-term standing water filled with decayed materials can "poison" somebody. It's not due to any microorganisms however. It's due to toxic waste by-products. And these are what make us "feel sick" when bacteria are actively restoring temporarily altered tissue. The waste by-product of bacteria causes putrefaction, which is, in a sense, a temporary mild poisoning. But the body is fully capable of dealing with this 99% of the time unless the person has been very sick and weak for a long time leading up to this process.
There are no "germs" as defined by the cult of scientism. And there's literally no proof of contagion. Koch's Postulates have never been satisfied in the history of scientism. They couldn't even prove contagion when they exposed healthy people to the snot and spit they had to eat/swallow nor coughs and sneezes right in their faces for over an hour. And that's hardly "science" as there's all kind of "stuff" in the mixture of these bodily fluids. But they still failed at this, again and again and again. Let alone trying to just transfer the bacteria, and nothing else, from a sick person to a healthy person without using an injection into the sterile environment. The annals of published medical science since time immemorial lack even a single paper supporting this nonsense. Because it's all a lie!
If "parasites" were the invasive, damaging critters you think they are, then we would see parasitic pandemics breaking out all the time. Everyone in the household should "get them" when one family member has them. And yet, this basically never happens...anywhere...ever. Let alone a town, village, city, etc. with thousands of people all "infested". That literally never happens.
Parasites are opportunistic, symbiotic organisms. If there's something for them to eat -> rotting, decayed tissue - then they'll stick around and feed on it until it has been removed. This is why most "parasitic conditions" revolve around the intestines & colon. Why aren't they attacking the eye, or the finger, or the lung, or the heart, or whatever?
And when the decayed tissue is removed, they simply move on to the next host. They're actually doing the organism a FAVOR. But if the organism is suffering a long-standing conflict they can't resolve, eventually nature will select them out of the survival of the fittest so they can't reproduce any longer.
Parasites do attack other body parts. You just aren't aware of it. You're not well-read in the sciences and probably have never done a single science experiment. You say there's no scientific paper, but I don't believe you've read a single one. Parasites don't often transmit from person to person because of hygiene. We don't prepare food after pooping without washing our hands first. Experiments prove how parasites come into humans and animals and how they spread.
Do you watch crazy internet videos?
We're worlds apart if you think you're reading "scientific papers". I've read thousands of pseudo-scientific papers - almost never seen an actual scientific paper. The overwhelming majority are filled with poppycock, hogwash and insanity.
I'll bet you can't produce a single one that is a truly "scientific paper" that follows the actual scientific method. Not a one. I can assure you none exist in the realm of "germ theory", ala "contagion" experiments with boogeyman-viruses/bacteria/fungi.
Because our feces is filled with toxins and waste. Has nothing to do with parasites.
Can you produce one that follows the scientific method? It needs to state an hypothesis, define an independent variable and perform control experiments that attempt to disprove the hypothesis. No "injections" allowed either.
If it doesn't include these 3 things, clearly stated, outlined and demonstrated in the "Methods" section of the paper, then it ain't a "scientific paper". It's a pseudo-scientific paper by definition. Which is 100% of the "germ theory" papers.
And said experiment should have been repeated many times by different experimenters as well to verify its validity in order to qualify as irrefutable. The stories of researchers trying to make a name for themselves by falsifying data to produce a result to gain attention, notoriety, money and grants are legion.
I'm all for "science". Unfortunately, almost nobody has been doing any real science in the "soft science" realm for well over 100 years now. And of course, it's never been done in the fraudulent field of "germ theory". Why? Because all the SCIENCE failed miserably to prove pathogenicity and contagion 100+ years ago. Koch's Postulates = 100% failure rate!!
Is it any wonder? Ghislane Maxwell's dad, Robert Maxwell, cornered the entire scientific and medical publishing industry 70-odd years ago (Elsevier), in addition to his near-monopoly on British tabloid newspapers ta boot!!! If you think his goal was to ensure truth, honesty, integrity and the best for humanity, I've got some very bad news for you....
I bet you spent a lot of time writing all that, just to have me blow it off.
You say I can't produce "one" and also say 100%. Both are totally wrong. But I'm not going to bother any more.
BTW, there are more medical publishers besides Elsevier. I have e-book versions of thousands of books by other publishers, such as Springer, Oxford University, Cambridge, and more. There are a lot of major tech publishers, such as Wiley. I have thousands of e-books just by Wiley.
You try to put words in my mouth, which I will not put up with, so don't bother wasting your time writing drivel.