Well, that's a good question. About 50% of the stuff that gets stickied here is total bullshit, the mods put it up to get people talking and keep engagement up on the site.
That puts us at cross purposes. Like how fox news tried to appease two groups. Those wanted news and those that require stuff like "engaging and varied entertainment". Hey, they both make the $$ and that is the whole venture.
Now here, we pretend the only venture is getting truth. But that is at cross purposes with the desire to always 9nly be winning and engaging and entertaining and making people's feelings feel really nice but at the same time embattled. It sucks because anons are allergic to propaganda at the same time as suffering from withdrawal from it and requiring it. Tough deal. Real tough problem.
He said confirmed like he was going to provide that confirmation, then he didn’t. What makes this confirmed? Does anyone here know? Pls help
Go through his history, he says that all the time with zero sauce.
So why is this stickied and accepted as fact here?
Well, that's a good question. About 50% of the stuff that gets stickied here is total bullshit, the mods put it up to get people talking and keep engagement up on the site.
That puts us at cross purposes. Like how fox news tried to appease two groups. Those wanted news and those that require stuff like "engaging and varied entertainment". Hey, they both make the $$ and that is the whole venture. Now here, we pretend the only venture is getting truth. But that is at cross purposes with the desire to always 9nly be winning and engaging and entertaining and making people's feelings feel really nice but at the same time embattled. It sucks because anons are allergic to propaganda at the same time as suffering from withdrawal from it and requiring it. Tough deal. Real tough problem.
Cause zero sauce 🐎💩 gets stickied here on the regular...
Confirmation bias! Is what this should say