Within the framework as it is now, it could be a nice present, despite maybe the chances of it being grandstanding and image-building to draw people away from Trump.
On the other hand, what of it if they introduce a CDBC? As Nigeria has shown, it may not be to the central governments advantage, and then they play the only card they have left: force and they bring guns.
But whatever the issue, for smart people, like with the plandemic, it is inconceivable to take this CBDC.
Yet, there is a fast difference between the US and Nigeria. The infusion of government into private lives of people, which is more extensive in the US than in Nigeria. So, people on foodstamps, and other .gov grants may be forced to take it, lest they forfeit the support.
I am sure this will lead to challenges, of course. I find it interesting they would first try it in Nigeria, with an abysmal adoption level. This way they can tweak introductions elsewhere.
It is also quite clear .gov will abuse any loophole to enforce this CBDC. For instance, farmer protests accompanied by their tractors, are a thorn in the side of the lefty animal protectors (PvdD), who would gladly break and enter into Farmers-houses and barns. They even promote it loudly. Yet, when it comes to protests, under the guise of evading dangerous situations, they want to outlaw tractors during demonstrations.
Ridiculous, but nevertheless, it is a small token of what they want. So, they could tinker around the traffic laws in order to make it difficult to use a tractor duding demonstrations.
Government shouldn’t have the authority to ban currencies it doesn’t like. Likewise, government shouldn’t force me to use a currency that I don’t want.
Think of the precedent this sets. The government doesn’t have the authority to ban whatever I wish to use or produce as currency.
Exactly. Hence, it would be a good thing to prevent the fed from scamming everybody.
The thing is: once you use a non-fiat currency, like private crypto, it cannot be used as a determiner to impose jurisdiction. See: Rome-II.
It would be good for government to prevent us from being scammed by the FED? What else do we need government to protect us from?
Within the framework as it is now, it could be a nice present, despite maybe the chances of it being grandstanding and image-building to draw people away from Trump.
On the other hand, what of it if they introduce a CDBC? As Nigeria has shown, it may not be to the central governments advantage, and then they play the only card they have left: force and they bring guns.
But whatever the issue, for smart people, like with the plandemic, it is inconceivable to take this CBDC.
Yet, there is a fast difference between the US and Nigeria. The infusion of government into private lives of people, which is more extensive in the US than in Nigeria. So, people on foodstamps, and other .gov grants may be forced to take it, lest they forfeit the support.
I am sure this will lead to challenges, of course. I find it interesting they would first try it in Nigeria, with an abysmal adoption level. This way they can tweak introductions elsewhere.
It is also quite clear .gov will abuse any loophole to enforce this CBDC. For instance, farmer protests accompanied by their tractors, are a thorn in the side of the lefty animal protectors (PvdD), who would gladly break and enter into Farmers-houses and barns. They even promote it loudly. Yet, when it comes to protests, under the guise of evading dangerous situations, they want to outlaw tractors during demonstrations.
Ridiculous, but nevertheless, it is a small token of what they want. So, they could tinker around the traffic laws in order to make it difficult to use a tractor duding demonstrations.
Government shouldn’t have the authority to ban currencies it doesn’t like. Likewise, government shouldn’t force me to use a currency that I don’t want.
Ron Paul loves it