273
It had to be this way Q said. Marker [9] lines up with the Trump indictment and the ticking Qagg clock. I have a feeling the walls around the SDNY will fall and the cases they have been protecting will be dusted off and justice will be served. Q-analysis!
posted ago by jhartz39 ago by jhartz39 +274 / -1

Today is Marker [9]

u/#q3717

Today, marker 9 lines up with the clock.

https://qagg.news/

If you go to my previous post you see that Q post 3004 lines up with the Qagg clock as well. [-21]

https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTeclm5N/everyone-hear-that-qagg-site-has/

u/#q3004

In post 3004 Q talks about Session and NO LEAKS, NONE.

Where has Sessions been, what has he been doing?

Q post 3004 also talks about Huber. He teamed up with Inspector General Michael Horowitz and they had a team of 470 investigators at their disposal.

According to Mike Gill, President Trump ordered Correy Lewandowski, his chief of staff, to bypass the Boston FBI and get Mike Gill in to a face to face interview with the top prosecutor of Massachusetts Andrew Lelling who then took it to the Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

Sessions recused himself from Russia case at the same time.

Now if you go back to 3004, the post mentions:

-clear vision for the @DOJ

-hold offenders accountable

-advance the rule of law.

When Mike Gill tried to take his evidence to the FBI and DOJ they refused to look at it. Perhaps the DOJ and FBI needs a clearer vision and learn how to advance the rule of law? Also, SDNY has not advanced the rule of law, they have abused it.

This Trump indictment is clearly prosecutorial misconduct. The SDNY is a corrupt institution, every case tried in SDNY dies there. I can think of several. Listed in the Q drop 4484.

https://qanon.pub/#4484

Somehow this Trump indictment is going to open the biggest can of worms in history. I do not know how it plays out, my guess is after this Trump indictment fails, perhaps a judicial review will be called for by the Supreme Court.

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

What would be found with a judicial review? Read 4484 again.

Stay safe my frens!!!

WWG1WGA!!!

16 comments
16 comments share save hide report block hide replies