Tell me again why Women's reproductive health doesn't mean anything?
(www.theguardian.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
LMAO! Yes, they can choose where they work. I love how you turned that around!!! :-( Forcing a live birth vs killing a baby!! I'll side with life. Why do you side with death? Just a simple question!
I don't think you understand that they're just turning arguments around on you.
They choose to stand by the freedom to do whatever they want to do. This is fine. If it leads to a shortage of capable people to provide services, then demand will be created and people will rise to fill those roles over time, especially as wages inevitably increase to provide incentive to work for the healthcare systems.
You can shame these doctors for their decisions, sure. But I also don't think they're necessarily evil for seeking work elsewhere. Especially if there are underhanded machinations going on where money is being thrown around to deprive the places that establish law against abortion of healthcare workers.
I saw the turn around. I'm fine with doctors being free to go where ever. Insurance does what insurance does. This entire thing is to save babies and lives. If insurance and doctors cause deaths, it's not the fault of those not wanting abortions. All life is precious.
That whole saving babies backfired.
They won't work there because malpractice insurance went up. This was a known reaction. It happens all the time in different areas for different types of medical practices.
You're going to have to come up with even more than money to pay a doctor who has to pay malpractice insurance that is more than they make as a living. The reason for the mass exedus is that insurance contracts limits the amount of pay. That means doctors can't raise their prices, so they move.
You should have educated yourself. You should have listened when people tried to educate you. Now you get to be the very same baby killer.
I literally defended and agreed with you and you tried to attack me.
Maybe dude's right, maybe you're a fuckin' retard after all lol.
If that's your idea of defending, when you've regurgitated forced birth points of view...
You clealry know nothing about pregnancies, and didn't read the article. The further a woman is from care, the more dangerous the pregnancy is for her.
really.... how did humanity survive until the last 100 years without the drug-pushing centers we now call hospitals?
So, Idaho says babies should be born, NOT killed, and save their lives. Drs and Insurance companies respond in a way that may effect the health of mothers and babies. So, the people that what to save babies lives are at fault for what Insurance companies do that cause doctors to move away and may kill lives??? The law is to save babies like us, we were babies years ago!! Side with fixing the issues and save lives and not a reason to blame those that wish life for the babies!
I side with female reproductive health. You ruined it, you now have to deal with the consequences. People that side with it don't have these problems. The ones that both voted against female reproductive health or happen to live where they voted against female reproductive health have to live with it.
AND there are women with autoimmune diseases that aren't getting proper care because their medication is considered an abortifact. Go explain yourselves to them while they suffer so people can pay themselves on the back that there won't even be any women Rx'd a medication that could do something as a side effect they don't agree with.