You're not even thinking before you post. First you didn't read the analysis, and now you're asking why Trump is not listed in the Astor genealogy. Flakey.
I read the "analysis." Sheer speculation. No genealogical evidence, as I said, and which you do not dispute. All it would take is birth records, but obviously they cannot substantiate this hypothesis or they would be revealed. Yes, "flakey" is the word to use for this imaginative notion. Or do you claim that Anthony Dexter is the son of Rudolf Valentino, simply because they look identical? That is really what this article amounts to: similarity of appearance proves genetic lineage. Really?
Why do you bother with these flaky comments when you didn't even read the entire analysis?
No genealogical evidence. It's like saying we have a second moon.
You're not even thinking before you post. First you didn't read the analysis, and now you're asking why Trump is not listed in the Astor genealogy. Flakey.
I read the "analysis." Sheer speculation. No genealogical evidence, as I said, and which you do not dispute. All it would take is birth records, but obviously they cannot substantiate this hypothesis or they would be revealed. Yes, "flakey" is the word to use for this imaginative notion. Or do you claim that Anthony Dexter is the son of Rudolf Valentino, simply because they look identical? That is really what this article amounts to: similarity of appearance proves genetic lineage. Really?
Are you drunk? You say you read the analysis but still fail to grasp that it said PHOTO ANALYSIS from the very beginning.
"BuT wHeRe Is TeH gEnEaLoGy???"
lol, it's right next to Obama's birth certificate. Holy hell dude.