Who knows? They'll probably say it was a glitch or something or they were hacked.
But there is zero info there that is new. Zero. All of it has already been reported on by various sources for over a year. The way back machine shows the article was exactly the same a year ago. There is zero news anywhere else concerning anything new with Durham or Sussman from any where else (that isn't using this as a source).
So......guess someone fucked up. 🤷♀️
Edited to add:
Some Twitter news accounts are automatically set up to send a tweet out whenever that account holder publishes an article.
So maybe someone (interns? Editors?) "accidentally" "updated" or regurgitated that article from last year and it automatically sent out that tweet.
Either way, Anons, who are supposed to be paying attention to this shit, should know that it's not new that it's being called a conspiracy, and should definitely know there was already a trial about it.
it shows as a new story on JustTheNews website I believe. and perusing around last night I came across a story where Jim Jordan (I think) mentions Durham with new charges. something tells me there's more to this than meets the eye
from the article, although still not sure what the "recent filing" is:
"This recent filing by Durham was designed to have two effects. First, and most important, he has now made any decision by the president or attorney general to dump him much more difficult to undertake. The last time a president fired a special prosecutor who was making significant progress, he lost his presidency."
Thanks so much! Really! You don't know how much time I spend trying to track down news items that other people reference in posts. It's gotten to the point that I just have to give up after awhile, not throwing good time after the bad.
This is some really interesting stuff, and makes me think now that the article we're talking about here was updated ( not changed but "regurgitated" you might say) to get this info circulating again, and get people reacquainted with the issue.
We've been waiting for a good minute or twelve waiting for Durham's wrap up report. Hopefully this is an indication that it will be sooner rather than later.
🤷♀️
Who knows? They'll probably say it was a glitch or something or they were hacked.
But there is zero info there that is new. Zero. All of it has already been reported on by various sources for over a year. The way back machine shows the article was exactly the same a year ago. There is zero news anywhere else concerning anything new with Durham or Sussman from any where else (that isn't using this as a source).
So......guess someone fucked up. 🤷♀️
Edited to add:
Some Twitter news accounts are automatically set up to send a tweet out whenever that account holder publishes an article.
So maybe someone (interns? Editors?) "accidentally" "updated" or regurgitated that article from last year and it automatically sent out that tweet.
Either way, Anons, who are supposed to be paying attention to this shit, should know that it's not new that it's being called a conspiracy, and should definitely know there was already a trial about it.
it shows as a new story on JustTheNews website I believe. and perusing around last night I came across a story where Jim Jordan (I think) mentions Durham with new charges. something tells me there's more to this than meets the eye
Ok, well, if you can ever link me to something new, then please do so. Thanks.
this post it turns out is what I saw
https://greatawakening.win/p/16amU1qM8z/-jim-jordan-said-he-is-working-t/c/
from the article, although still not sure what the "recent filing" is:
"This recent filing by Durham was designed to have two effects. First, and most important, he has now made any decision by the president or attorney general to dump him much more difficult to undertake. The last time a president fired a special prosecutor who was making significant progress, he lost his presidency."
Thanks so much! Really! You don't know how much time I spend trying to track down news items that other people reference in posts. It's gotten to the point that I just have to give up after awhile, not throwing good time after the bad.
This is some really interesting stuff, and makes me think now that the article we're talking about here was updated ( not changed but "regurgitated" you might say) to get this info circulating again, and get people reacquainted with the issue.
We've been waiting for a good minute or twelve waiting for Durham's wrap up report. Hopefully this is an indication that it will be sooner rather than later.