Here's one of the six new paragraphs. Show me where this, and the other five paragraphs, are in the article from the Wayback link that you posted.
"Patel, who helped unravel the false Russia collusion narrative with former Rep. Devin Nunes, said the new filing by Durham is one of the most significant in the entire investigation to date."
I didn't post a link to the wayback machine before, but here is one. Not sure how to "show you", other than giving a link and having you read it, so.... 🤷♀️
That's not the wayback machine, and I never claimed it was the same article.
It's not even the same website.
I was using that to show people that Durham was saying that it was a conspiracy a year ago, because it says it right in the headline.
I can't trust that anyone here will go to all the effort of actually reading the entire article. I have to make it as simple as possible and spoon feed it to people.
But apparently that backfired, seeing as how you didn't even bother to check if it was the same news source, or author, or article, or anything.
🤦♀️
JFC, I really don't know why I even bother sometimes. I really don't.
Here's one of the six new paragraphs. Show me where this, and the other five paragraphs, are in the article from the Wayback link that you posted.
"Patel, who helped unravel the false Russia collusion narrative with former Rep. Devin Nunes, said the new filing by Durham is one of the most significant in the entire investigation to date."
I didn't post a link to the wayback machine before, but here is one. Not sure how to "show you", other than giving a link and having you read it, so.... 🤷♀️
https://web.archive.org/web/20220430054444/https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/durham-bombshell-fbi-text-message-shows-clinton-lawyer
That link was what that article looked like on April 30, 2022. Looks exactly the same to me. So, again.....🤷♀️
Edited to add:
But just to Scooby-Doo this shit, why exactly are you thinking those paragraphs are new?
The link you posted twice, and referenced to in your previous posts;
https://www.thefreedomtimes.com/2022/04/05/new-durham-filing-reveals-text-message-from-sussman-joint-venture-or-conspiracy-to-smear-trump/
Did not include those six paragraphs.
Perhaps the reason for your initial confusion?
That's not the wayback machine, and I never claimed it was the same article.
It's not even the same website.
I was using that to show people that Durham was saying that it was a conspiracy a year ago, because it says it right in the headline.
I can't trust that anyone here will go to all the effort of actually reading the entire article. I have to make it as simple as possible and spoon feed it to people.
But apparently that backfired, seeing as how you didn't even bother to check if it was the same news source, or author, or article, or anything.
🤦♀️
JFC, I really don't know why I even bother sometimes. I really don't.
So, you decided to reference an article where you came to a mistaken conclusion. Now you state that you did that because you 'care'.
That's funny, you're quite adept at covering your mistakes. I will give you credit for that.
Why did I mention '"Wayback" in my previous post?
You're welcome.