I envision some type of Blockchain system for anonymity and a simple algorithm that would serve as the randomizer... Any info that passes through is spit out into millions of pieces.
I'm not explaining it very well but perhaps a tech head with a more robust pedigree could fill in the blanks on how to achieve this
I my view, here is the kicker. Dems like to accuse guns for violence. By the same token, they accuse platforms for misinformation, and type of currency of criminal behavior.
They change cause and effect in terms of order.
These people are sick in the head and anti-nature.
If you compare an IP address to a phone number, you could make the analogy DNS is a like a phone book, where Google.com's "phone number" = 142.250.199.46 (Google has multiple IP addresses but that is one of them).
If you go to this website and ignore any security warnings from the browser, it will load Google - https://142.250.199.46/
What you're describing is actually how a VPN works. Hundreds of people share the same IP address and it's the VPN provider who determines where the packets requested end up.
Your ISP knows you're connected to the VPN, and how much bandwidth is being used, but nothing else. In essence, your VPN host has the same information your ISP would normally have.
Do you trust your VPN host more than your ISP? You have to trust someone else if you want to go online.
With that being said, a VPN will not protect you from the NSA and will not protect your anonymity, as they have many other ways of determining your identity.
TOR and Tails adds the additional layers of security needed in theory, until you realize some of the exit nodes are controlled by 5 Eyes government agencies.
Then there's the fact even installing additional fonts in a vanilla Windows install is enough to create a unique digital fingerprint that can be used to track you online.
The best protection is staying offline completely.
I had thought about a chaff system before, so that the algos wouldn't be able to target ads to you, or news or anything else. But then I thought that instead of getting targeted ads, I'd just be getting more of them.
But it would certainly frustrate the marketers and surveillance agencies if everybody sent out 20 random searches for every real search. You could kinda do it for email and social media, but you'd also need a lot of auto-generated fake accounts for it to work. Sigh...
It would be a huge endeavor you would need maybe 100,000 people committed to the full idea. Nobody would get involved unless it accomplished that baseline usage.
Is that digital chaff? I like it. How do ordinary peeps get a randomizer?
I envision some type of Blockchain system for anonymity and a simple algorithm that would serve as the randomizer... Any info that passes through is spit out into millions of pieces.
I'm not explaining it very well but perhaps a tech head with a more robust pedigree could fill in the blanks on how to achieve this
You need an IP address in order to communicate with other computers.
So whether you disguise your IP with TOR and/or a VPN or not at all. you can't get around that fact.
TOR and Tails is about as close as you're going to get to what you're describing, and I'm sure that will be on the list of "banned apps." Kek.
add: Loki net.
I my view, here is the kicker. Dems like to accuse guns for violence. By the same token, they accuse platforms for misinformation, and type of currency of criminal behavior.
They change cause and effect in terms of order.
These people are sick in the head and anti-nature.
The IP address shouldn't matter if you get thousands of millions of blocks of random info.
Don't think you understand.
If you compare an IP address to a phone number, you could make the analogy DNS is a like a phone book, where Google.com's "phone number" = 142.250.199.46 (Google has multiple IP addresses but that is one of them).
If you go to this website and ignore any security warnings from the browser, it will load Google - https://142.250.199.46/
What you're describing is actually how a VPN works. Hundreds of people share the same IP address and it's the VPN provider who determines where the packets requested end up.
Your ISP knows you're connected to the VPN, and how much bandwidth is being used, but nothing else. In essence, your VPN host has the same information your ISP would normally have.
Do you trust your VPN host more than your ISP? You have to trust someone else if you want to go online.
With that being said, a VPN will not protect you from the NSA and will not protect your anonymity, as they have many other ways of determining your identity.
TOR and Tails adds the additional layers of security needed in theory, until you realize some of the exit nodes are controlled by 5 Eyes government agencies.
Then there's the fact even installing additional fonts in a vanilla Windows install is enough to create a unique digital fingerprint that can be used to track you online.
The best protection is staying offline completely.
Not a bad analogy actually
I had thought about a chaff system before, so that the algos wouldn't be able to target ads to you, or news or anything else. But then I thought that instead of getting targeted ads, I'd just be getting more of them.
But it would certainly frustrate the marketers and surveillance agencies if everybody sent out 20 random searches for every real search. You could kinda do it for email and social media, but you'd also need a lot of auto-generated fake accounts for it to work. Sigh...
Yeah that's true.
It would be a huge endeavor you would need maybe 100,000 people committed to the full idea. Nobody would get involved unless it accomplished that baseline usage.