If an indictment remains “under seal” , how can it be legally announced by the prosecutor? And this references a “Supreme Court Indictment “rather than a “Grand Jury indictment “ , something is fishy about this statement.
I see your point now. I thought you were differentiating between what the Q drop is and this statement... but instead, you are calling out that it would be a Grand Jury indictment from NY... so it is odd to state the SC.
Sometimes I’m dense....I totally missed that implication, thank you.
If the DA’s office really cared, no leaks would have occurred. That is how sealed indictments and Grand Juries are supposed to be run. Until the Grand Jury votes everyone is considered innocent until the indictment is unsealed. Have you heard anything about the greater than 300,000 cases that are sealed by Durham. Rule of law, honesty and integrity matters.
If an indictment remains “under seal” , how can it be legally announced by the prosecutor? And this references a “Supreme Court Indictment “rather than a “Grand Jury indictment “ , something is fishy about this statement.
Interesting.
Could there be parallel indictment(s) unsealing occurring?
There are only 399,907 Sealed Indictments to chose from.
Tick tock mf'rs.
This statement references a “Supreme Court indictment “ not a “Grand Jury Indictment “.
I’m not Q-drop savvy enough to know your substantiation for this. Can you share your insights and why/how you came to that conclusion?
I’m assuming you are right.... I would just like to understand better.
Its in the statement not in the q drop.
I see your point now. I thought you were differentiating between what the Q drop is and this statement... but instead, you are calling out that it would be a Grand Jury indictment from NY... so it is odd to state the SC.
Sometimes I’m dense....I totally missed that implication, thank you.
Yes the supreme court thing threw me too. I guess that the Judge is from the NY supreme court. I dont know how they swing it in NY.
I don't know either... But it is an interesting point .... Especially given the ambiguity of the statement.
I noticed that too.
If the DA’s office really cared, no leaks would have occurred. That is how sealed indictments and Grand Juries are supposed to be run. Until the Grand Jury votes everyone is considered innocent until the indictment is unsealed. Have you heard anything about the greater than 300,000 cases that are sealed by Durham. Rule of law, honesty and integrity matters.