I like the future proves past stuff. The 1776 (Queen thing) and 1984 (Trump's supposed arrest next Tuesday) have my attention, too.
I know we are watching a movie.
What are some plausible scripts? (I am not asking for dates).
Mine is this: Trump is arrested. The Awakening accelerates. There are riots because the opportunity is ripe. Nat Guard is activated in many states. Somehow we get to Martial Law. Indictments unsealed. Perps rounded up. The real trials begin.
Basic premise is this: arresting Trump is the equivalent of throwing the first punch (everything else has been posturing). Now the gloves come off and the stage is truly set because everyone will be watching, and under Martial Law even the MSM will be taken over so the people can see and hear the truth.
This happens over the course of a few months. Economy tanks. Market tanks. Banking system breaks. Life gets scary, but it's all blamed on the FJB regime.
And then we rebuild after peace, truth and patriotism are restored.
The end.
I have zero idea of what the plan may be. Zero, zip.
I admire the fact that you've put yourself out there and plainly said what you believe will happen. This is something that just rarely happens around here.
I often feel like I'm the only person out here who is just bewildered by everything going on, and everyone else seems to know something I don't.
You keep seeing people say to "Trust the Plan", but when you say "ok, what's the plan?", they get downright hostile and start ranting that you need to spend thousands of hours decoding Q drops like they did to know what the plan is. That if only you read the Q drops, the plan will be crystal clear to you.
Which seems unlikely considering that there is always infighting here on basic stuff, like if Trump is secretly still the President or not.
What gets me are the people who are just so confident in thinking that they know exactly what is going on, and what will happen in the future and aren't shy in the least in telling everyone else that they're idiots for not knowing or not agreeing with them. Yet these same people a couple of years ago would have sworn on the Bible that they believed Trump would be in office right now.
I have yet to see anyone show they knew that the plan was for the dems to steal the election and for Biden to be in the WH now before it happened. Everyone has perfect 20/20 vision in hindsight with all the "It Had To Be This Way Because..." explanations.
I think if everyone was wrong about such a basic, significant part of the plan, people need to back off on all the shit talking to people who don't agree with them and those who are looking for anything that might guide them.
I got banned a week or so ago for questioning the logistical operation of the plan. I was asking how can such a small amount of military personal convince the other military members to make sure the plan is carried out, especially considering the high level of corruption within our military already. I emphasized the type of military tactics it would take to overthrow these people would be done by the special operations command but then how would the rest of the military react while this is going on.
It was a genuine question as I was wondering what the plan was as well because it seems that nothing is going our way and we are losing at every turn but everything is apparently for "optics."
Instead of anyone answering the question, I got people mad at me for misquoting a Qpost which to me ended up being huge mandela affect because I've seen "the first arrest will shock the world" posted, including stickied, time and time again and I've never seen a correction on it but that isn't actually the Q post. But instead of answering the bulk of the post, they got mad at me for misquoting that one quote, ignored the rest of the post, and banned me.
Honestly, I'll probably get banned for dooming and questioning with this comment here.
Yeah, seems familiar. I just got off a ban for asking someone what they thought the plan was, and then having a conversation about it. Apparently I was supposed to just drop the entire conversation after someone said "read the Q drops!".
I'm surprised I've gotten this far in this conversation. 🤷♀️
And that whole "the first arrest will shock the world" thing is annoying. It has been repeated here ad nauseum, and has indeed lodged itself in many people's minds because of that. I don't blame the people who are confused by it. I blame whatever Q paytriot it was that originally mangled the quote and whatever Anon came running here, posting it over and over again.
I think it's an excellent example of why falsehoods need to be called out promptly, from the start, so they don't start taking on a life of their own and just makes everything so much more confusing.
But people who get all nit picky about facts here aren't very well received, sometimes. Accusations of being a shill like to be tossed about for those who think fact checking is important. Go figure.
Also, good point on the number of military personnel needed for such a large scale operation.
It is kind of crazy how we aren't allowed to question anything. I'm not even trying to be a shill or anything. I'm just trying to play devils advocate the majority of the time. If we are supposed to be critical thinkers, why are we not able to listen to any opposing possibilities? Why are we so afraid to actually have a debate?
I have read a lot of the Q posts, I've been a member of the original "TheDonald" since 2016 on Reddit. I've been a member here since it started. But the inability to question things and how quickly they break out the ban hammer here for doing so puts off such a shitty and unwelcoming vibe. And when don't get banned, there is no dialogue that takes place other then shit talking about the reading the q posts and learn what you are talking about.
Honestly, it makes us seem like a bunch of leftists here with how we react to any thought that questions us.
Yeah, that's pretty much my take on it, too.
How often are we told to "question everything!"? But obviously that doesn't apply here?
And it's sad to see how few people are able to hold a civil conversation with differing viewpoints. People get downright hateful just because someone doesn't agree with everything they say.
The more that I ponder it, the more I think all the "read the Q drops!" and refusal to have a deep conversation about The Plan is to protect against criticism.
It's easier to give the impression of a unified front if people aren't willing to put their ideas out there. If everyone is constantly told they will understand The Plan if they just read the Q drops gives the impression that many here are on the same page as to what The Plan is.
Because if people just said they didn't really know the details of the Plan, then it just makes it look really weird to constantly be told to Trust The Plan.
Just imagine the conversation.
"Trust the Plan!" "OK, What's the plan?" "I'm not really sure, but it's important to trust it!"
I can just imagine what the comments would be if the dems did something similar.
But, whatever. I'm sure that such blasphemy is going to earn me another time out.
So, it's been a nice chat with most of you. Just remember critical thinking isn't a personality flaw and echo chambers are dangerous.
✌️
Goes on Q board, complains that people recommend reading Q's drops.
Fuck else you want?