I plan on posting this everywhere I see this on here so we stay skeptical but...
This document DOES NOT describe Graphene Oxide in the formulation. The document is talking about the PREPARATION PROCEDURE to analyze the purified protein in a Cryo-Electron Microscope (EM).
I would have posted this on twitter too but I'm not on twitter. This guy seems to have mentioned it though (had to scroll way to far to find it)
If you want to watch a few minutes of this video, this researcher talks about what they found in over 2k vials from different manufacturers around the world. They all contain the same poisons and no mrna.
@50 minutes it's what's in the jabs. Hydrogel, liquid nanoparticles, graphene oxide and heavy metals.
I'm skeptical of her story, skimmed through the beginning of the video and the time points you mentioned.
She is WAY overhyping hydrogels. Hydrogels are just polymers (natural or synthetic) that can bind to water. Things like corn starch, gelatin, aloe, fancier sounding things like hydroxypropyl methylcellulose or carbomer-based. They're often used as viscosity modifiers.
Lots of talk. Lack of proof.
You can go to google scholar and search "Characterization of ....." of whatever type of material you're interested in and see how many techniques are needed to get confirmation of materials and what kind of data is expected to be reported.
Do you work in the medical field? I ask because I do and I see a lot of death and destruction after these jabs. What would be her reasons to lie? Do you think the shots are good for you? You seem rather naive. Not being rude but you seem to want to just explain everything away that you can't see with your own eyes. This is very serious, millions have died and are sick from this poison. What's your proof that hydrogel is good for you? What's your proof there isn't graphene oxide in the jabs? You need to come with proof if you want to denigrate someone else's research.
Jolly good. Product improvement. Get your Vaxx now! With improved recipe and a brand new box! but wait there is more .... You also get your lipid nanoparticle that can really penetrate into everything. No spot left behind!
This is a presentation by Pierre Capel, Emeritus Professor of Experimental Immunology and explains it really well: bio-distribution and immunization with the title: flowers and the bees.
I have a degree of expertise in the various subjects she is discussing in the video and have experience in process audits. I agree with many of her statements as an opinion, but there is a difference between presenting evidence of truth vs opinion. I absolutely do not believe these shots are good and they are incredibly harmful and possibly a bridge to something even worse (check out the current "gene therapy" landscape as a result of mRNA). But I try to address each statement or question to their own merits.
I am not about to speculate on her motive, but she is making some very large claims while providing descriptions and sources from (what I saw) entirely web based searches. She is making claims on actually analyzing these samples but I did not see ANY data presented on the techniques she claims. For example, she discusses metals analysis but doesn't mention techniques (or data). If I missed explanations in the videos regarding this please prove me wrong. I did not make the claim there is graphene oxide in these samples but I do know of techniques and data that would provide support for that claim, and I haven't seen it yet.
Proving there isn't graphene oxide is a very different approach then proving there is. The original discussion was that Pfizer provided documents that proved there is Graphene oxide in the formulations and I'm flat out saying that's a lie based on the document provided, not based on trust but that anyone here can read the paragraph, see what it's referencing, and search the technique and preparation procedures to confirm what I'm saying.
Again, most of this is my opinion and I don't really care if others believe me, but it gives another trail of breadcrumbs to follow for others who want to verify what shes saying. I'm tired of the deception. Shadows have nowhere to hide in the light.
Hydrogels...They're often used as viscosity modifiers...
Ok. And, one of the main concerns about the jab is blood clotting. Not all engines can operate safely with [mixing] different viscosity oils. I know I sure as hell don't want the viscosity of fluids in my blood being altered, without knowing if that hydrogel will increase, or decrease blood viscosity.
People were not informed of that possible side effect. No informed consent = fraud.
I'm gonna stay on my lane , but, I have seen many postings of graphene being a ingredient of the vax, especially when 5 g network is discussed. Also, my understanding is that the COVID 19 virus was never isolated , so how could a vax be created without it? And the squid like creature in the vax that moves on its own?
I found this comment, ” if you'd actually read what it says, you'd realize graphene oxide is used in electron microscopy of the purified protein, which is very distinct from the vaccine.” It’s also how I read it, but I’m an uneducated moron, so what do I know. 🙂
I plan on posting this everywhere I see this on here so we stay skeptical but...
This document DOES NOT describe Graphene Oxide in the formulation. The document is talking about the PREPARATION PROCEDURE to analyze the purified protein in a Cryo-Electron Microscope (EM).
I would have posted this on twitter too but I'm not on twitter. This guy seems to have mentioned it though (had to scroll way to far to find it)
https://twitter.com/a_nineties/status/1642464023357661184
If you want to watch a few minutes of this video, this researcher talks about what they found in over 2k vials from different manufacturers around the world. They all contain the same poisons and no mrna.
@50 minutes it's what's in the jabs. Hydrogel, liquid nanoparticles, graphene oxide and heavy metals.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/6uY601hwZIId/
@1:08 she talks about the flu shots they looked at contain the same mixture
@1:14 she believes there are no placebos that were given.
I'm skeptical of her story, skimmed through the beginning of the video and the time points you mentioned.
She is WAY overhyping hydrogels. Hydrogels are just polymers (natural or synthetic) that can bind to water. Things like corn starch, gelatin, aloe, fancier sounding things like hydroxypropyl methylcellulose or carbomer-based. They're often used as viscosity modifiers.
Lots of talk. Lack of proof.
You can go to google scholar and search "Characterization of ....." of whatever type of material you're interested in and see how many techniques are needed to get confirmation of materials and what kind of data is expected to be reported.
Do you work in the medical field? I ask because I do and I see a lot of death and destruction after these jabs. What would be her reasons to lie? Do you think the shots are good for you? You seem rather naive. Not being rude but you seem to want to just explain everything away that you can't see with your own eyes. This is very serious, millions have died and are sick from this poison. What's your proof that hydrogel is good for you? What's your proof there isn't graphene oxide in the jabs? You need to come with proof if you want to denigrate someone else's research.
Instead of using aluminum or thermosal they are using graphene now in so called "vaxxes".
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21568886/
So not only is graphene use in the development of these "jabs" but also part of the delivery process.
Jolly good. Product improvement. Get your Vaxx now! With improved recipe and a brand new box! but wait there is more .... You also get your lipid nanoparticle that can really penetrate into everything. No spot left behind!
For those with ability to call upon YT subs: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=cVRsPSwOe_0
This is a presentation by Pierre Capel, Emeritus Professor of Experimental Immunology and explains it really well: bio-distribution and immunization with the title: flowers and the bees.
I have a degree of expertise in the various subjects she is discussing in the video and have experience in process audits. I agree with many of her statements as an opinion, but there is a difference between presenting evidence of truth vs opinion. I absolutely do not believe these shots are good and they are incredibly harmful and possibly a bridge to something even worse (check out the current "gene therapy" landscape as a result of mRNA). But I try to address each statement or question to their own merits.
I am not about to speculate on her motive, but she is making some very large claims while providing descriptions and sources from (what I saw) entirely web based searches. She is making claims on actually analyzing these samples but I did not see ANY data presented on the techniques she claims. For example, she discusses metals analysis but doesn't mention techniques (or data). If I missed explanations in the videos regarding this please prove me wrong. I did not make the claim there is graphene oxide in these samples but I do know of techniques and data that would provide support for that claim, and I haven't seen it yet.
Proving there isn't graphene oxide is a very different approach then proving there is. The original discussion was that Pfizer provided documents that proved there is Graphene oxide in the formulations and I'm flat out saying that's a lie based on the document provided, not based on trust but that anyone here can read the paragraph, see what it's referencing, and search the technique and preparation procedures to confirm what I'm saying.
Again, most of this is my opinion and I don't really care if others believe me, but it gives another trail of breadcrumbs to follow for others who want to verify what shes saying. I'm tired of the deception. Shadows have nowhere to hide in the light.
Ok. And, one of the main concerns about the jab is blood clotting. Not all engines can operate safely with [mixing] different viscosity oils. I know I sure as hell don't want the viscosity of fluids in my blood being altered, without knowing if that hydrogel will increase, or decrease blood viscosity.
People were not informed of that possible side effect. No informed consent = fraud.
I'm gonna stay on my lane , but, I have seen many postings of graphene being a ingredient of the vax, especially when 5 g network is discussed. Also, my understanding is that the COVID 19 virus was never isolated , so how could a vax be created without it? And the squid like creature in the vax that moves on its own?
I found this comment, ” if you'd actually read what it says, you'd realize graphene oxide is used in electron microscopy of the purified protein, which is very distinct from the vaccine.” It’s also how I read it, but I’m an uneducated moron, so what do I know. 🙂
It acts like a binder. Sticky like asphalt and then cures hard melding whatever you want together.
Very likely at least as much as the "experts". An "expert" is quite often someone who has been educated beyond their intellect.
With the emphasis on e-ducat-ed. lead to belief.
Graphene is used not only for the development but also part of the delivery along with the nano lipid protein.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26814441/