That’s bc Trumps team is going to embarrass them with legal insight can’t have that on tape or video. This doesn’t make sense I thought they wanted the circus?
"... He ruled that the integrity of the court’s impartiality outweighed the "monumental significance" of the case and the "unparalleled public interest" it has generated. ..."
.
I guess that same logic would apply to, say, a future military tribunal of a former president - hypothetically-speaking, of course.
.
I'm not sure what their strategy is here. I agree with you that they risk being embarrassed with live coverage. And they obviously have no integrity nor are they impartial. My guess is they're going to use FNM narrative-pushers to generate the impression amongst their dwindling number of viewers that Trump is guilty of a number of "crimes" so that when Trump walks free on actual innocence the FNM will cry foul and claim the justice system is rigged against the left.
Right. Perhaps both sides want this and for different reasons. Trump's legal team's stated reason is so it doesn't turn into a "spectacle". IMO it also sets a precedent for holding arraignments and trials for high-ranking individuals in more private settings - kind of like the way military tribunals can occur.
The rabid left could not care less what Trump's legal team wants. They'll do whatever they feel is advantageous for themselves. Their implied/stated position is that they want to maintain "the integrity of the court's impartiality". (More virtue signaling to their sheeple base and narrative talking points for their soulless FNM minions since the vast majority of Americans knows these marxist turds have no integrity and no impartiality). Could they be realizing that this very stupid banana republic move of going after Trump wasn't well thought out after all?
I had hoped the tribunals would be televised. Transparency and all that. I just hope the left can't spin the narrative that Trump is railroading a bunch of democrats in secret trials to defeat his opponents, political witch hunt, blah blah.
You know that's exactly how they'll spin it. It actually doesn't matter just what the WHs do because the left lives in a little TDS fantasy world of their own.
The WHs are setting the precedent now for trials outside the "supervision" of the media circus by playing along with this sham illegal attack on POTUS. Whether or not the left wants to twist their wee minds into pretzels telling themselves that it's not okay to go after Barry, George and Billy, but was right and honorable and good for democracy et al ad nauseam to go after Trump, it won't matter. The protective little taboo the cabal had in place shielding their accomplished little apparatchik former presidents has been shattered.
That’s bc Trumps team is going to embarrass them with legal insight can’t have that on tape or video. This doesn’t make sense I thought they wanted the circus?
"... He ruled that the integrity of the court’s impartiality outweighed the "monumental significance" of the case and the "unparalleled public interest" it has generated. ..."
.
I guess that same logic would apply to, say, a future military tribunal of a former president - hypothetically-speaking, of course.
.
I'm not sure what their strategy is here. I agree with you that they risk being embarrassed with live coverage. And they obviously have no integrity nor are they impartial. My guess is they're going to use FNM narrative-pushers to generate the impression amongst their dwindling number of viewers that Trump is guilty of a number of "crimes" so that when Trump walks free on actual innocence the FNM will cry foul and claim the justice system is rigged against the left.
Exactly what I thought. Left definitely want to Control the narrative.
They want a circus that they have COMPLETE control over. Like the J6 videos that were cherry picked to be shown to the public for the past 2 years
It was the Trump legal team that requested that no video be taken or cell phones be allowed in the courtroom
Right. Perhaps both sides want this and for different reasons. Trump's legal team's stated reason is so it doesn't turn into a "spectacle". IMO it also sets a precedent for holding arraignments and trials for high-ranking individuals in more private settings - kind of like the way military tribunals can occur.
The rabid left could not care less what Trump's legal team wants. They'll do whatever they feel is advantageous for themselves. Their implied/stated position is that they want to maintain "the integrity of the court's impartiality". (More virtue signaling to their sheeple base and narrative talking points for their soulless FNM minions since the vast majority of Americans knows these marxist turds have no integrity and no impartiality). Could they be realizing that this very stupid banana republic move of going after Trump wasn't well thought out after all?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-lawyer-says-his-team-doesn-t-want-cameras-in-court/ar-AA19qqDD
I had hoped the tribunals would be televised. Transparency and all that. I just hope the left can't spin the narrative that Trump is railroading a bunch of democrats in secret trials to defeat his opponents, political witch hunt, blah blah.
You know that's exactly how they'll spin it. It actually doesn't matter just what the WHs do because the left lives in a little TDS fantasy world of their own.
The WHs are setting the precedent now for trials outside the "supervision" of the media circus by playing along with this sham illegal attack on POTUS. Whether or not the left wants to twist their wee minds into pretzels telling themselves that it's not okay to go after Barry, George and Billy, but was right and honorable and good for democracy et al ad nauseam to go after Trump, it won't matter. The protective little taboo the cabal had in place shielding their accomplished little apparatchik former presidents has been shattered.