Trump's indictment unsealed
(www.manhattanda.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (100)
sorted by:
Yea, the explainer is in the accompanying "statement of facts" released by the DA: https://embed.documentcloud.org/documents/23741794-donald-trump-statement-of-facts/?embed=1&responsive=1&title=1
The claim is that DJT and Trump Org wanted to reimburse Cohen, but didn't want it on the books what they were really paying him for. So, they had Cohen send invoices monthly for a retainer agreement which didn't actually exist, and they put that on the books when they cut him the checks.
IF. If it was illegal to pay for a non-disclosure. Um is it? Beware they are dressing this up in salacious details such as some sexual relationship. It has already been establshed that there was none of that, and Daniels now owes lots of money to Trump.
How do we know that Cohen's invoices and payments were NOT for other types of services rendered? How, do submitting the proof of the transactions as proof that something untoward happened? Is it illegal to reimburse someone when they invoice you?