IMO, a victory. They know nothing can or will come of this "arrest." Nothing there but 34 similarly stated accusations related to a convicted felon (Cohen) and a pornstar who admitted there was nothing there.
So the celebration is 2-fold:
This indictment has no legs to stand on.
Sets precedent to go after other Presidents who are OBVIOUS criminals (Clinton, Obama, Biden, etc) guilty of FAR WORSE crimes (think pizzagate, hunter's laptop, and the Weiner "insurance" files)
All of which has me thinking (and I could be wrong) that this was a total WH op to set the standard so once Trump retakes power he can do the same with REAL evidence
These indictments hugely enrage and energize the base and are so clearly fraudulent that millions of fence-sitters will move to Donald's side and wake up many who hadn't quite let themselves see how vile the Cabal really is. As a result, the indictments ensure a win so big for Trump in 2024 that no amount of cheating can overcome it.
Yes, that too. Unless those fence-sitters are un-awakend normies 100% dialed into whatever MSM like CNN says and just hear "indicted and arrested" as the candidate (Trump) and thus think "Oh, he's sketchy? Lemme vote for the other guy then"
Those fence-sitters, unfortunately, aren't the brightest bulbs if they haven't figured it out by now and cannot be relied upon
There ARE lots of those, yes, but I personally know a fair number of very bright people who are just laser-focused on their careers and/or families, don't spend much time surfing New Media, and get much of their info from the social environment at thier government employers (many of are programmers for gov't and gov't adjacent companies). They have big IQs but are a bit short on social smarts.
IMO, a victory. They know nothing can or will come of this "arrest." Nothing there but 34 similarly stated accusations related to a convicted felon (Cohen) and a pornstar who admitted there was nothing there.
So the celebration is 2-fold:
This indictment has no legs to stand on.
Sets precedent to go after other Presidents who are OBVIOUS criminals (Clinton, Obama, Biden, etc) guilty of FAR WORSE crimes (think pizzagate, hunter's laptop, and the Weiner "insurance" files)
All of which has me thinking (and I could be wrong) that this was a total WH op to set the standard so once Trump retakes power he can do the same with REAL evidence
One more reason to celebrate:
Yes, that too. Unless those fence-sitters are un-awakend normies 100% dialed into whatever MSM like CNN says and just hear "indicted and arrested" as the candidate (Trump) and thus think "Oh, he's sketchy? Lemme vote for the other guy then"
Those fence-sitters, unfortunately, aren't the brightest bulbs if they haven't figured it out by now and cannot be relied upon
There ARE lots of those, yes, but I personally know a fair number of very bright people who are just laser-focused on their careers and/or families, don't spend much time surfing New Media, and get much of their info from the social environment at thier government employers (many of are programmers for gov't and gov't adjacent companies). They have big IQs but are a bit short on social smarts.
The base in Wisconsin failed yesterday .
Might just be a shot of the normal dinning room.
Kek!
I like this Anon