If the Constitution, represented by the flag, and the law of the flag title 4: 1,2,3 specifically says to add nothing and put nothing above the flag, and yet, certain people do it, all the while you are noticing the destruction of the Constitution:
What then could be the reason to alter the flag? What then does.it signal in terms of contract? Has the contract been altered?
Nothing is coincidental, despite the fact that these changes are presented as something they want you to belief.
Then ask yourself.
If the Constitution, represented by the flag, and the law of the flag title 4: 1,2,3 specifically says to add nothing and put nothing above the flag, and yet, certain people do it, all the while you are noticing the destruction of the Constitution: What then could be the reason to alter the flag? What then does.it signal in terms of contract? Has the contract been altered?
Nothing is coincidental, despite the fact that these changes are presented as something they want you to belief.
Lots of things are coincidental.
cohencidental .... yes. But in politics nothing is co-incidental.
Nonsense.
Nice dodge.
You are not the sole arbiter of symbolism, and you never will be, no matter how hard you try.