Says where in the Constitution? It is interesting that the argument for the existence of a slippery, slimy, superior law is couched in slippery, slimy terms.
Right next to the section with no standing when wanting to resolve stolen elections from ballot harvesting fraud and digital counting machines that syphon votes from one party to another.
Says where in the Constitution? It is interesting that the argument for the existence of a slippery, slimy, superior law is couched in slippery, slimy terms.
Right next to the section with no standing when wanting to resolve stolen elections from ballot harvesting fraud and digital counting machines that syphon votes from one party to another.