The fact that you ignored my second question and pretended I didn't even ask it is all the proof I need that you did answer both questions.
You have no idea how virologists claim to prove anything about viruses, and you believe in viruses because you have been told to and have not been willing to research the subject yourself.
At this point, my only questions is this: Why do you not give a damn about knowing the truth?
They are not artist's drawings. I think you know this. Prove that they are? You can't. All you have is your dismissive know-nothing-ism. You also don't know anything about the concept of contagion, which is how the idea was established in the first place, but I won't bother you with it.
Seriously?
Artists' drawings is your reason to believe that viruses exist?
By that reasoning, I guess this is "proof" to you that unicorns exist:
https://www.qwant.com/?client=brz-moz&t=images&q=unicorns
Seeing is believing, after all.
The fact that you ignored my second question and pretended I didn't even ask it is all the proof I need that you did answer both questions.
You have no idea how virologists claim to prove anything about viruses, and you believe in viruses because you have been told to and have not been willing to research the subject yourself.
At this point, my only questions is this: Why do you not give a damn about knowing the truth?
They are not artist's drawings. I think you know this. Prove that they are? You can't. All you have is your dismissive know-nothing-ism. You also don't know anything about the concept of contagion, which is how the idea was established in the first place, but I won't bother you with it.