I agree with you on this. Its a hook for shutting topics down, but the context is important, no one legit shuts down well thought out points and arguments that aren't overtly emotionally driven or attempting to drive others emotions.
Also please for fucks sake, just type out "something".
HIM: Protests take organization. Organization takes money and a compliant press. There are no "organic" protests. The French Revolution, for example, was organized and paid for by the Rothschilds.
YOU: Sounds like DOOMER talk to me!
ME: Sometimes I think the term DOOMER is used like a killer argument. Do you have s.th. better than that? A REAL ARGUMENT?
YOU: I agree with you on this. Its a hook for shutting topics down, but the context is important, no one legit shuts down well thought out points and arguments that aren't overtly emotionally driven or attempting to drive others emotions. Also please for fucks sake, just type out "something".
-> so ridiculous what lengthy "conservation" was made up by you after that = "disruption much"?
-> s.th. more you want to contribute to this subject?
I agree with you on this. Its a hook for shutting topics down, but the context is important, no one legit shuts down well thought out points and arguments that aren't overtly emotionally driven or attempting to drive others emotions.
Also please for fucks sake, just type out "something".
Do you have s.th. like an allergy against abbreviations? Why?
Abr. r ok. s.ti it is btr nt 2 do unnec. abr. tho. let me expl;
We have a lot we need to read here. No one wants to spend an extra 2-3 seconds per word figuring out someone's uncommon shorthand language.
you are a bit pathetic about s.th.?
Take the feedback or don't, I didn't insult you.
-> so ridiculous what lengthy "conservation" was made up by you after that = "disruption much"?
-> s.th. more you want to contribute to this subject?