Win / GreatAwakening
GreatAwakening
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
GreatAwakening Where We Go Qne, We Go All!
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

29
I hate this thought 🤔💭 Theory 😲💡
posted 2 years ago by Afropick07 2 years ago by Afropick07 +30 / -1

What if at some point in the trial the judge comes up with some justification to say Trump cannot be prosecuted because he was a former President, thus giving precedent to protections for Biden and Obama and the other crooks?

11 comments share
11 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (11)
sorted by:
▲ 9 ▼
– needorganization 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

Why would a former president have anything to do with the law?

If Bill Clinton or his wife murdered people, we just gonna give immunity because he's a former president?

Naw dawg. Naw.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Afropick07 [S] 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Thats kinda already the case.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– MICHIGANisRED 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Trump has been arraigned so the cat's out of the bag. Seems logical any president can now be arraigned.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Afropick07 [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

But not convicted, and they have no case, but they could still claim the case is their but due to judges perception of the rules, Trump is let off. They might let him off due to statute of limitations, while still implying hes guilty, but if they they claim its because hes former pres, the protection foundation could be laid out doe thwir corrupt buddies.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Smokerstar 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

"No one is above the law".

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– 1Corporal 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

blood in the water already! sharks doing what sharks do best

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

That would get immediately appealed by the state and reversed by an appellate court. Not gonna happen.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Afropick07 [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

What if this is their get outta jail card? They dont have a case anyway so now they get to say Trump’s guilty but just couldnt be convicted because hes a former pres, AND you also cant convict Biden or Obama cause now theres precedent.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

The problem is that there is no basis in law for such a proposition. It would also piss off 90% of the country. While not every possible scenario has worked its way through the court system in this country, you still need some foundational legal principles to apply in order to arrive at that conclusion. There is simply nothing out there that could support that holding a particular office renders you untouchable. That is about as antithetical to our legal system as it gets. Not even the most hatchet judge of all hatchet judges could make this idea hold water. There is a huge difference from historical practice to the idea that serious crimes could be committed by a president and nothing done about it. In fact, the Constitution itself specifically says that a president impeached and removed can be indicted for that crime. The punishment is not limited to removal from office.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Afropick07 [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Ok, maybe Im over simplifying the idea. My fear is that the judge will throw the case out and mention that Trump is former pres. Then the idea takes hold that the case was thrown out BECAUSE he was a former pres (by msm and democrats). Another judge then rules on future case against Biden that there is precent for the case to be tossed. Judges can get away with things if there is no public outcry.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AllowMeToExplain 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

District court cases basically aren’t precedential in our legal system. Some states like Minnesota outright say as much. Only courts of appeals or state supreme courts are binding precedent. What a district court judge does or doesn’t do is not really consequential as far as creating precedent goes in the legal system.

permalink parent save report block reply

Welcome

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield - Together We Win

Rules

Q Supporters:
This is The Great Awakening. Our community is international, focused on helping ourselves and others walk away from the programming, and return our governments to "by the people, for the people!"

Follow the Law:
No posts or comments that violate laws in your jurisdiction or the United States. The Feds are always watching!

No Bad Behavior!
No doxing, including revealing personal information of non-public figures, as well as addresses, phone numbers, etc. of public figures. All GAW users must adhere to the highest standards of conduct, whichever .WIN they are on. If we are notified by other moderators of incivil behavior on other .WINs, you WILL be banned here!

Civil Discussion ONLY:
They want you divided.
They want you labeled by race, religion, class, sex, etc.
Divided you are weak [no collective power].
Divided you attack each other and miss the true target [them].

No PAYtriots/No Self Promotion:
Linking or promoting merchandise, fundraising, or spamming personal websites, blogs, or channels is not permitted. Do not attempt to profit from Q or advertise for those who do. Peace is the prize. We do it for free.

Questions and Concerns: All moderation questions and concerns should be submitted via modmail. DO NOT GRIEF the mods.

Expand your thinking:
Remember, this .WIN is the public face of the Great Awakening, and, as a member here, you agree to represent the Great Awakening movement against Globalism, Communism and Progressive Insanity in the best, most positive way possible. NOTE: Your comments and posts may become news. Keep it classy!

This is not a 'fringe conspiracy' site: Topics related to flat earth theory, faked moon landings, and chemtrails are explicitly prohibited on The Great Awakening. Visit https://conspiracies.win if that's your thing!

No doomers, shills, or tards: THIS IS AN ELITE RESEARCH BOARD. If you can't use common sense you'll get banned without hesitation. If you're a shill, you fall under this rule. If you're a doomer, you fall under this rule as you just add garbage to the site like the other two. This includes forum sliding. Q said "We are saving Israel for last," and so are we. And if you're a tard, oh, man.

General Rules:

-Mods used to issue warnings, followed by temporary bans and/or permanent bans. We don't, anymore. DO NOT GRIEF THE MODS.

-Keep posts related to topics Q has raised or that are current. We try to keep an open mind, but... c'mon.

-Keep post duplication (especially from other .WINs) to a minimum. No crap, off-topic memes

-HIGH EFFORT, HIGH-INFO participation only! Please respect other readers' time. Please use descriptive titles. No URLs in titles, pls. No clickbait. Keep your comments high effort. No BS.

-No fame-fagging; no, "your" post did not get removed! Were you the original author?? Eyes on the prize, frogs!

-Memes encouraged, but no low-quality, low-info trash, pls. Excessive, low-effort posting may earn users vacations!

-Keep it honest and accurate.

-Patriots.win / Q Supporters ONLY. (Sorry, this train still has no brakes.)

-Handshake noobs will be scrutinized by their command of Q, sincerity, and respect to others.

Remember, your conduct here represents the Q movement! OUR ENEMIES ARE WATCHING! (Hi, Mike! You LOSER!)

Resources

  • WELCOME TO THE DIGITAL BATTLEFIELD
  • "River of Search" script:
  • GAW post formatting tips
  • Q Research (Q only posts at 8kun)
  • Q post archives (qagg.news) others 1 2 3 4
  • Browse Drops from the beginning
  • QProofs.com
  • Learn to read the Q map
  • Book of Q Proofs v1.3 (pdf)
  • Law of War & Majic Eyes Qnly Resources
  • Trumps twitter archive
  • POTUS: The Calm Before The Storm
  • Pedosta and DNC dumps
  • GIFs & QPosts
  • Poll Post Format
  • SPY ON US! See: mod Logs
  • The Greatest Show on Earth!
  • New to Q? "The Earth Chronicles Ep 12: Q & The White-Hat Op: What's Real, What's Not?" DO NOT MISS THIS PODCAST!

Disclaimer

Posts and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the GreatAwakening.win or Patriots.win administration.

Moderators

  • dropgun
  • catsfive
  • AutoMod
  • Filter
  • parallax_crow
  • Fatality
  • BasedCitizen
  • Qanaut
  • and 6 more...
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - dr488 (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy