Frank was a commie and was into some pornographic fiction. He allegedly took naked photos of Stanley Ann (you can probably find them on the web). 0Bama's book mentions a family friend "Frank" that was also living in Hawaii at the time.
Yes, if you born here you are a US citizen. BUT the Constitution carefully explains that the US President and the VP must be a NATURAL BORN Citizen.
During the era when the Constitution was written, much of it was based on Vattels' Laws of Nations which commonly referred to both of the child's parents had to be citizens.
The reason for this extra requirement was to be certain the President and VP held no allegiance to any foreign nation.
Frank was a commie and was into some pornographic fiction. He allegedly took naked photos of Stanley Ann (you can probably find them on the web). 0Bama's book mentions a family friend "Frank" that was also living in Hawaii at the time.
Cool...I'm not sure how that relates to Frank being his dad.
Yes, if you born here you are a US citizen. BUT the Constitution carefully explains that the US President and the VP must be a NATURAL BORN Citizen.
According to the supreme court, a natural born citizen is anyone born on american soil, regardless of their parent's nationality.
It was speculated that since 0bama's mother and Grandfather hung out with Frank, and Frank took naked photos of Stanley Ann, he may be the father.
Ted Lieu is gas lighting. Many years ago, the Supreme Court case Minor V Happersett disappeared from the free Lexus Nexus law research database.
In that SC case Natural Born is explained as:
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents.
All the sources routinely used to interpret the Constitution confirm that the phrase “natural born Citizen” has a specific meaning: namely, someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time.
This wouldn't be the first time the Supreme Court would be wrong. The term "natural-born citizen" was a term of art in the international law of the time. It had nothing to do with where one was born, but had everything to do with the requirement that one's parents had to be U.S. citizens. The Constitution must be understood in terms of its original language.
And, as I said, they have been famously wrong in the past. If they decree that 2 + 2 = 5 are you going to accept it? What is important is the truth, and that needs to be understood and argued at all times.
Frank was a commie and was into some pornographic fiction. He allegedly took naked photos of Stanley Ann (you can probably find them on the web). 0Bama's book mentions a family friend "Frank" that was also living in Hawaii at the time.
Yes, if you born here you are a US citizen. BUT the Constitution carefully explains that the US President and the VP must be a NATURAL BORN Citizen.
During the era when the Constitution was written, much of it was based on Vattels' Laws of Nations which commonly referred to both of the child's parents had to be citizens.
The reason for this extra requirement was to be certain the President and VP held no allegiance to any foreign nation.
Cool...I'm not sure how that relates to Frank being his dad.
According to the supreme court, a natural born citizen is anyone born on american soil, regardless of their parent's nationality.
https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/natural-born-citizen-ceiling#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court%20has%20stated,1898%20case%20United%20States%20v.
It was speculated that since 0bama's mother and Grandfather hung out with Frank, and Frank took naked photos of Stanley Ann, he may be the father.
Ted Lieu is gas lighting. Many years ago, the Supreme Court case Minor V Happersett disappeared from the free Lexus Nexus law research database.
In that SC case Natural Born is explained as:
https://harvardlawreview.org/forum/vol-128/on-the-meaning-of-natural-born-citizen/
Sure, but speculation is just speculation.
But, regardless, as you quoted:
This wouldn't be the first time the Supreme Court would be wrong. The term "natural-born citizen" was a term of art in the international law of the time. It had nothing to do with where one was born, but had everything to do with the requirement that one's parents had to be U.S. citizens. The Constitution must be understood in terms of its original language.
The interpretation of the constitution is assigned to the supreme court, though.
And, as I said, they have been famously wrong in the past. If they decree that 2 + 2 = 5 are you going to accept it? What is important is the truth, and that needs to be understood and argued at all times.