No discussion about Hitler/WW2 is complete without also reading and fully understanding the book "The Magic of Money" by Hajaalmar Schaacht.
I have written multiple times about this, but the most important point for Anons heading down this research path is that nothing is black and white. Yes, the WW2 is heavily misrepresented and everything we were taught is very possibly a lie. And yes, it's quite clear that the bad guys won, but do everyone understand what that really means?
Both sides of this war was funded by the same people. It is very possible that Hitler was, like so many others before and after him - a guy groomed by the Banksters, who later woke up realised the reality was different and tried to go against them.
But, does that mean, like so many of these documentaries portray, the whole Nazi movement (Inb4, yeah they didn't call themselves Nazis) was pure as fresh snow? And these folks actually lost the war?
A lot of what we call Cabal originated from the powerful elements within the Nazis, and they were carefully brought over to the US and other countries and their research was integrated with the shadow technologies.
WW2, just like most major wars and global tragedies, was orchestrated by shades of evil in all direction with only a few in there who had even an inkling of what was going on. Unlike, now, where that inkling of understanding has been rapidly spreading through the population, even before we reach the final phase, for a very good reason - to not repeat the history endlessly.
thanks for posting this. I am glad that you did not include "Europa the Last Battle" - the one that most people get easily sucked into, and also the one that paints the picture in sheer black and white.
The choice to "rule over others" leads the individual down the dark/negative path as a matter of natural universal law as taking control over the fate/destiny/affairs of others breaks natural/universal/God's law of free will.
Thus, no "leader/president/chancellor/premier/emperor/king/queen/etc. can avoid this fate...
There are a few saintly people who were royalty, very few out of all of them, but the fact they exist is extremely important. Because there must be leaders and they must be righteously held to high standards. Some of them can be identified by their unwillingness to take the reins, that must be recruited, talked into it, forced into it, like George Washington, Augusto Pinochet, and Donald J Trump.
Most will not be climbing that political money-grubbing ladder like smarmy used car salesmen always searching your eyes for a hint of acceptance or rejection.
Regardless of one's best intentions, the very act of "ruling over others" starts the individual down the dark/negative path. It's universal law.
"The golden rule" is the only "law" we need and it doesn't require any "leader" to enforce.
Additionally, think carefully about whether you have the RIGHT to take away the freedoms/property/choices of another man/woman. If nobody gave you that right, then how is it possible you can somehow give such a RIGHT to an "elected official"?
It's not possible. Do you see?
Thus, by believing in a false "right" of the "leader" to take away rights of others, all voters in these systems of government bear some responsibility for breaking this universal law as well.
This is more or less what the founding fathers set up in 1776. The "President" was nothing more than the CEO of a company/business that was tasked with carrying out 19 enumerated tasks. Neither the "President", nor Congress, nor the Supreme Court were set up to make any rules restricting the freedoms of the people inhabiting the sovereign states. All the "legislative" rules created were corporate by-laws to hold the "government" employees in check. Their Acts and Codes had nothing to do with the people, quite naturally.
Why would "The People" want to vote for someone that could turn around and restrict their rights? Makes no sense at all... does it?
Interesting that you equate leaders with taking away freedoms. Leaders aren't rulers, and legislators are neither. Those should be mostly administrators, and very limited as such. The complacency of the people allowed elected public servants to start behaving as rulers. This was enabled by the indoctrination of students within a system guaranteed to keep them unthinking and ignorant. Note the sharp change between the inventive boom of the 1800s with the decline by the 1900s. Check when public schools were mandated.
Baseline, the educational system requires extreme overhaul, the 1776 Project provides a framework for history and civics, but logic, rhetoric and reason must be re-instilled, among with fundamentals including home economics and shop class, elimination of universal pricey colleges, restoration of tech schools and cleansing of 'higher learning' toward MAGA.
The local fights need to be engaged in, local just and godly leaders must take places in the churches, towns and school councils, every position of authority and responsibility must be cleansed and refilled with stable Patriots, committed to the long haul. No one needs to be stuck in a job like that forever, and should not be, but a pipeline of local Patriots and youth must be established to prevent commies from ever gaining a foothold again. Then we work up through counties and states to eliminate unjust taxation, unjust codes, unjust laws... while addressing corporate ownership of the state and federal houses, the bureaucracy and agencies.
Not seeing where any of this involves deprivation of rights, but rather restoration of rights. I'm a practical person but I do engage in philosophical matters, so I'd refer back to Tocqueville's writings on why America was exceptional in his day, wrt all the best western civilization back to the Roman empire had to offer.
No discussion about Hitler/WW2 is complete without also reading and fully understanding the book "The Magic of Money" by Hajaalmar Schaacht.
I have written multiple times about this, but the most important point for Anons heading down this research path is that nothing is black and white. Yes, the WW2 is heavily misrepresented and everything we were taught is very possibly a lie. And yes, it's quite clear that the bad guys won, but do everyone understand what that really means?
Both sides of this war was funded by the same people. It is very possible that Hitler was, like so many others before and after him - a guy groomed by the Banksters, who later woke up realised the reality was different and tried to go against them.
But, does that mean, like so many of these documentaries portray, the whole Nazi movement (Inb4, yeah they didn't call themselves Nazis) was pure as fresh snow? And these folks actually lost the war?
A lot of what we call Cabal originated from the powerful elements within the Nazis, and they were carefully brought over to the US and other countries and their research was integrated with the shadow technologies.
WW2, just like most major wars and global tragedies, was orchestrated by shades of evil in all direction with only a few in there who had even an inkling of what was going on. Unlike, now, where that inkling of understanding has been rapidly spreading through the population, even before we reach the final phase, for a very good reason - to not repeat the history endlessly.
thanks for posting this. I am glad that you did not include "Europa the Last Battle" - the one that most people get easily sucked into, and also the one that paints the picture in sheer black and white.
The choice to "rule over others" leads the individual down the dark/negative path as a matter of natural universal law as taking control over the fate/destiny/affairs of others breaks natural/universal/God's law of free will.
Thus, no "leader/president/chancellor/premier/emperor/king/queen/etc. can avoid this fate...
There are a few saintly people who were royalty, very few out of all of them, but the fact they exist is extremely important. Because there must be leaders and they must be righteously held to high standards. Some of them can be identified by their unwillingness to take the reins, that must be recruited, talked into it, forced into it, like George Washington, Augusto Pinochet, and Donald J Trump.
Most will not be climbing that political money-grubbing ladder like smarmy used car salesmen always searching your eyes for a hint of acceptance or rejection.
Who says so?
Regardless of one's best intentions, the very act of "ruling over others" starts the individual down the dark/negative path. It's universal law.
"The golden rule" is the only "law" we need and it doesn't require any "leader" to enforce.
Additionally, think carefully about whether you have the RIGHT to take away the freedoms/property/choices of another man/woman. If nobody gave you that right, then how is it possible you can somehow give such a RIGHT to an "elected official"?
It's not possible. Do you see?
Thus, by believing in a false "right" of the "leader" to take away rights of others, all voters in these systems of government bear some responsibility for breaking this universal law as well.
This is more or less what the founding fathers set up in 1776. The "President" was nothing more than the CEO of a company/business that was tasked with carrying out 19 enumerated tasks. Neither the "President", nor Congress, nor the Supreme Court were set up to make any rules restricting the freedoms of the people inhabiting the sovereign states. All the "legislative" rules created were corporate by-laws to hold the "government" employees in check. Their Acts and Codes had nothing to do with the people, quite naturally.
Why would "The People" want to vote for someone that could turn around and restrict their rights? Makes no sense at all... does it?
Interesting that you equate leaders with taking away freedoms. Leaders aren't rulers, and legislators are neither. Those should be mostly administrators, and very limited as such. The complacency of the people allowed elected public servants to start behaving as rulers. This was enabled by the indoctrination of students within a system guaranteed to keep them unthinking and ignorant. Note the sharp change between the inventive boom of the 1800s with the decline by the 1900s. Check when public schools were mandated.
Baseline, the educational system requires extreme overhaul, the 1776 Project provides a framework for history and civics, but logic, rhetoric and reason must be re-instilled, among with fundamentals including home economics and shop class, elimination of universal pricey colleges, restoration of tech schools and cleansing of 'higher learning' toward MAGA.
The local fights need to be engaged in, local just and godly leaders must take places in the churches, towns and school councils, every position of authority and responsibility must be cleansed and refilled with stable Patriots, committed to the long haul. No one needs to be stuck in a job like that forever, and should not be, but a pipeline of local Patriots and youth must be established to prevent commies from ever gaining a foothold again. Then we work up through counties and states to eliminate unjust taxation, unjust codes, unjust laws... while addressing corporate ownership of the state and federal houses, the bureaucracy and agencies.
Not seeing where any of this involves deprivation of rights, but rather restoration of rights. I'm a practical person but I do engage in philosophical matters, so I'd refer back to Tocqueville's writings on why America was exceptional in his day, wrt all the best western civilization back to the Roman empire had to offer.