No discussion about Hitler/WW2 is complete without also reading and fully understanding the book "The Magic of Money" by Hajaalmar Schaacht.
I have written multiple times about this, but the most important point for Anons heading down this research path is that nothing is black and white. Yes, the WW2 is heavily misrepresented and everything we were taught is very possibly a lie. And yes, it's quite clear that the bad guys won, but do everyone understand what that really means?
Both sides of this war was funded by the same people. It is very possible that Hitler was, like so many others before and after him - a guy groomed by the Banksters, who later woke up realised the reality was different and tried to go against them.
But, does that mean, like so many of these documentaries portray, the whole Nazi movement (Inb4, yeah they didn't call themselves Nazis) was pure as fresh snow? And these folks actually lost the war?
A lot of what we call Cabal originated from the powerful elements within the Nazis, and they were carefully brought over to the US and other countries and their research was integrated with the shadow technologies.
WW2, just like most major wars and global tragedies, was orchestrated by shades of evil in all direction with only a few in there who had even an inkling of what was going on. Unlike, now, where that inkling of understanding has been rapidly spreading through the population, even before we reach the final phase, for a very good reason - to not repeat the history endlessly.
thanks for posting this. I am glad that you did not include "Europa the Last Battle" - the one that most people get easily sucked into, and also the one that paints the picture in sheer black and white.
There is no chance that Hitler was on the side of the bankers.
If you learn about his early adulthood, his failure as an art student (because he actually created good art in an era that appreciated depravity), and then his time as a soldier in WWI (where he could not advance beyond corporal because his captain thought that Hitler "lacked leadership skills"), and then you understand what was happening in post-WW1 Germany and Hitler's attempt to counter the communists ... when you put all the pieces of the puzzle together, along with his outlawing usury and arresting Louis Rothschild, you cannot possibly come to the conclusion that he had any backing at all from the banksters.
Hitler was a deranged Idolater that had mire in common with the communists that history lets on. That being said we should have fought the russians instead because germany would have been an easier threat to deal with afterwards
Can you expand on europa? This, and ‘greatest story never told’ are redpills imo. I’m interested in the counter-argument. Serious question. Truth seeker. Not a glowie. Just drinking whiskey and looking for truth. Okay, now I sound like a glowie, lol. I have read creature from jekyll island and have a basic understanding of khaballah.
I do not know your top-line, argument, magic of money book, but I can guess.
The biggest problem I had with both Europa and Greatest Story Never Told was the stark black and white way in which they portray not just Hitler but also Nazis in their entirety.
The second part is demonstrably false, as we are seeing the very same Nazis running the Cabal, the Nazi connections in NASA, in CIA torture methods, MK Ultra etc etc. All started development under the real Nazis. And ofc, Nazis in Ukraine even today.
They also portray Hitler as the saviour who came in and took control of the Weimar hyper inflation. Timeline does not work. Infact the inflation was created by the Banksters and also reined in by the Banksters, and in part helped solidify Hitler's power.
Don't get me wrong - Hitler did great things for the economy, but he always had the Bankster's support up until the moment he declared the war.
My personal theory is that Hitler and Stalin worked together to purge the Cabal assets in both Germany, and USSR (and the area in between). Hitler also didnot allow Nazi's to go to the full extent their masters wanted them to (like building Atom Bomb as just one clear example). This was probably why Hitler had to be defeated and real Nazi's had to be relocated.
Those who watch both those documentaries miss this entirely, and are lead to believe that Nazis were nobel and Hitler was fighting the Cabal from day 1.
The choice to "rule over others" leads the individual down the dark/negative path as a matter of natural universal law as taking control over the fate/destiny/affairs of others breaks natural/universal/God's law of free will.
Thus, no "leader/president/chancellor/premier/emperor/king/queen/etc. can avoid this fate...
There are a few saintly people who were royalty, very few out of all of them, but the fact they exist is extremely important. Because there must be leaders and they must be righteously held to high standards. Some of them can be identified by their unwillingness to take the reins, that must be recruited, talked into it, forced into it, like George Washington, Augusto Pinochet, and Donald J Trump.
Most will not be climbing that political money-grubbing ladder like smarmy used car salesmen always searching your eyes for a hint of acceptance or rejection.
Regardless of one's best intentions, the very act of "ruling over others" starts the individual down the dark/negative path. It's universal law.
"The golden rule" is the only "law" we need and it doesn't require any "leader" to enforce.
Additionally, think carefully about whether you have the RIGHT to take away the freedoms/property/choices of another man/woman. If nobody gave you that right, then how is it possible you can somehow give such a RIGHT to an "elected official"?
It's not possible. Do you see?
Thus, by believing in a false "right" of the "leader" to take away rights of others, all voters in these systems of government bear some responsibility for breaking this universal law as well.
This is more or less what the founding fathers set up in 1776. The "President" was nothing more than the CEO of a company/business that was tasked with carrying out 19 enumerated tasks. Neither the "President", nor Congress, nor the Supreme Court were set up to make any rules restricting the freedoms of the people inhabiting the sovereign states. All the "legislative" rules created were corporate by-laws to hold the "government" employees in check. Their Acts and Codes had nothing to do with the people, quite naturally.
Why would "The People" want to vote for someone that could turn around and restrict their rights? Makes no sense at all... does it?
Interesting that you equate leaders with taking away freedoms. Leaders aren't rulers, and legislators are neither. Those should be mostly administrators, and very limited as such. The complacency of the people allowed elected public servants to start behaving as rulers. This was enabled by the indoctrination of students within a system guaranteed to keep them unthinking and ignorant. Note the sharp change between the inventive boom of the 1800s with the decline by the 1900s. Check when public schools were mandated.
Baseline, the educational system requires extreme overhaul, the 1776 Project provides a framework for history and civics, but logic, rhetoric and reason must be re-instilled, among with fundamentals including home economics and shop class, elimination of universal pricey colleges, restoration of tech schools and cleansing of 'higher learning' toward MAGA.
The local fights need to be engaged in, local just and godly leaders must take places in the churches, towns and school councils, every position of authority and responsibility must be cleansed and refilled with stable Patriots, committed to the long haul. No one needs to be stuck in a job like that forever, and should not be, but a pipeline of local Patriots and youth must be established to prevent commies from ever gaining a foothold again. Then we work up through counties and states to eliminate unjust taxation, unjust codes, unjust laws... while addressing corporate ownership of the state and federal houses, the bureaucracy and agencies.
Not seeing where any of this involves deprivation of rights, but rather restoration of rights. I'm a practical person but I do engage in philosophical matters, so I'd refer back to Tocqueville's writings on why America was exceptional in his day, wrt all the best western civilization back to the Roman empire had to offer.
No discussion about Hitler/WW2 is complete without also reading and fully understanding the book "The Magic of Money" by Hajaalmar Schaacht.
I have written multiple times about this, but the most important point for Anons heading down this research path is that nothing is black and white. Yes, the WW2 is heavily misrepresented and everything we were taught is very possibly a lie. And yes, it's quite clear that the bad guys won, but do everyone understand what that really means?
Both sides of this war was funded by the same people. It is very possible that Hitler was, like so many others before and after him - a guy groomed by the Banksters, who later woke up realised the reality was different and tried to go against them.
But, does that mean, like so many of these documentaries portray, the whole Nazi movement (Inb4, yeah they didn't call themselves Nazis) was pure as fresh snow? And these folks actually lost the war?
A lot of what we call Cabal originated from the powerful elements within the Nazis, and they were carefully brought over to the US and other countries and their research was integrated with the shadow technologies.
WW2, just like most major wars and global tragedies, was orchestrated by shades of evil in all direction with only a few in there who had even an inkling of what was going on. Unlike, now, where that inkling of understanding has been rapidly spreading through the population, even before we reach the final phase, for a very good reason - to not repeat the history endlessly.
thanks for posting this. I am glad that you did not include "Europa the Last Battle" - the one that most people get easily sucked into, and also the one that paints the picture in sheer black and white.
Money runs the entire world in more ways than people understand. Root of all evil?
Nice comment and nice post btw. Thank you both. u/gapingQ u/bubble_bursts
Hopefully more and more people are understanding the full meaning of "Money is the root of all evil".
The love of money.
Particularly when you love it so much that it reproduces in the form of usurious compound interest.
The love of money is the root of many evils
The love of kidfucking is the rest
Money is only the material reference of people's agreement.. Your agreement, conscious or unconscious, is the most valuable "thing" in existence.
There is no chance that Hitler was on the side of the bankers.
If you learn about his early adulthood, his failure as an art student (because he actually created good art in an era that appreciated depravity), and then his time as a soldier in WWI (where he could not advance beyond corporal because his captain thought that Hitler "lacked leadership skills"), and then you understand what was happening in post-WW1 Germany and Hitler's attempt to counter the communists ... when you put all the pieces of the puzzle together, along with his outlawing usury and arresting Louis Rothschild, you cannot possibly come to the conclusion that he had any backing at all from the banksters.
He even created his own money.
Zero chance, and really it is just blasphemy.
If you understand the mechanics of "how he created his own money", you will understand it was backed by the Banksters.
Hitler was a deranged Idolater that had mire in common with the communists that history lets on. That being said we should have fought the russians instead because germany would have been an easier threat to deal with afterwards
Can you expand on europa? This, and ‘greatest story never told’ are redpills imo. I’m interested in the counter-argument. Serious question. Truth seeker. Not a glowie. Just drinking whiskey and looking for truth. Okay, now I sound like a glowie, lol. I have read creature from jekyll island and have a basic understanding of khaballah.
I do not know your top-line, argument, magic of money book, but I can guess.
The biggest problem I had with both Europa and Greatest Story Never Told was the stark black and white way in which they portray not just Hitler but also Nazis in their entirety.
The second part is demonstrably false, as we are seeing the very same Nazis running the Cabal, the Nazi connections in NASA, in CIA torture methods, MK Ultra etc etc. All started development under the real Nazis. And ofc, Nazis in Ukraine even today.
They also portray Hitler as the saviour who came in and took control of the Weimar hyper inflation. Timeline does not work. Infact the inflation was created by the Banksters and also reined in by the Banksters, and in part helped solidify Hitler's power.
Don't get me wrong - Hitler did great things for the economy, but he always had the Bankster's support up until the moment he declared the war.
My personal theory is that Hitler and Stalin worked together to purge the Cabal assets in both Germany, and USSR (and the area in between). Hitler also didnot allow Nazi's to go to the full extent their masters wanted them to (like building Atom Bomb as just one clear example). This was probably why Hitler had to be defeated and real Nazi's had to be relocated.
Those who watch both those documentaries miss this entirely, and are lead to believe that Nazis were nobel and Hitler was fighting the Cabal from day 1.
What if those soldiers were mostly Khazarians and their assets ? Would that then make sense?
Except they edited their post to include it now and Europa is emotionally manipulative stormfag BS
We have been lied to about ww2 but it goes way beyond "muh white race"
The choice to "rule over others" leads the individual down the dark/negative path as a matter of natural universal law as taking control over the fate/destiny/affairs of others breaks natural/universal/God's law of free will.
Thus, no "leader/president/chancellor/premier/emperor/king/queen/etc. can avoid this fate...
There are a few saintly people who were royalty, very few out of all of them, but the fact they exist is extremely important. Because there must be leaders and they must be righteously held to high standards. Some of them can be identified by their unwillingness to take the reins, that must be recruited, talked into it, forced into it, like George Washington, Augusto Pinochet, and Donald J Trump.
Most will not be climbing that political money-grubbing ladder like smarmy used car salesmen always searching your eyes for a hint of acceptance or rejection.
Who says so?
Regardless of one's best intentions, the very act of "ruling over others" starts the individual down the dark/negative path. It's universal law.
"The golden rule" is the only "law" we need and it doesn't require any "leader" to enforce.
Additionally, think carefully about whether you have the RIGHT to take away the freedoms/property/choices of another man/woman. If nobody gave you that right, then how is it possible you can somehow give such a RIGHT to an "elected official"?
It's not possible. Do you see?
Thus, by believing in a false "right" of the "leader" to take away rights of others, all voters in these systems of government bear some responsibility for breaking this universal law as well.
This is more or less what the founding fathers set up in 1776. The "President" was nothing more than the CEO of a company/business that was tasked with carrying out 19 enumerated tasks. Neither the "President", nor Congress, nor the Supreme Court were set up to make any rules restricting the freedoms of the people inhabiting the sovereign states. All the "legislative" rules created were corporate by-laws to hold the "government" employees in check. Their Acts and Codes had nothing to do with the people, quite naturally.
Why would "The People" want to vote for someone that could turn around and restrict their rights? Makes no sense at all... does it?
Interesting that you equate leaders with taking away freedoms. Leaders aren't rulers, and legislators are neither. Those should be mostly administrators, and very limited as such. The complacency of the people allowed elected public servants to start behaving as rulers. This was enabled by the indoctrination of students within a system guaranteed to keep them unthinking and ignorant. Note the sharp change between the inventive boom of the 1800s with the decline by the 1900s. Check when public schools were mandated.
Baseline, the educational system requires extreme overhaul, the 1776 Project provides a framework for history and civics, but logic, rhetoric and reason must be re-instilled, among with fundamentals including home economics and shop class, elimination of universal pricey colleges, restoration of tech schools and cleansing of 'higher learning' toward MAGA.
The local fights need to be engaged in, local just and godly leaders must take places in the churches, towns and school councils, every position of authority and responsibility must be cleansed and refilled with stable Patriots, committed to the long haul. No one needs to be stuck in a job like that forever, and should not be, but a pipeline of local Patriots and youth must be established to prevent commies from ever gaining a foothold again. Then we work up through counties and states to eliminate unjust taxation, unjust codes, unjust laws... while addressing corporate ownership of the state and federal houses, the bureaucracy and agencies.
Not seeing where any of this involves deprivation of rights, but rather restoration of rights. I'm a practical person but I do engage in philosophical matters, so I'd refer back to Tocqueville's writings on why America was exceptional in his day, wrt all the best western civilization back to the Roman empire had to offer.