Welcome to General Chat - GAW Community Area
This General Chat area started off as a place for people to talk about things that are off topic, however it has quickly evolved into a community and has become an integral part of the GAW experience for many of us.
Based on its evolving needs and plenty of user feedback, we are trying to bring some order and institute some rules. Please make sure you read these rules and participate in the spirit of this community.
Rules for General Chat
-
Be respectful to each other. This is of utmost importance, and comments may be removed if deemed not respectful.
-
Avoid long drawn out arguments. This should be a place to relax, not to waste your time needlessly.
-
Personal anecdotes, puzzles, cute pics/clips - everything welcome
-
Please do not spam at the top level. If you have a lot to post each day, try and post them all together in one top level comment
-
Try keep things light. If you are bringing in deep stuff, try not to go overboard.
-
Things that are clearly on-topic for this board should be posted as a separate post and not here (except if you are new and still getting the feel of this place)
-
If you find people violating these rules, deport them rather than start a argument here.
-
Feel free to give feedback as these rules are expected to keep evoloving
In short, imagine this thread to be a local community hall where we all gather and chat daily. Please be respectful to others in the same way
Hot take: I have the feeling that, however good their intentions was, the whole effort from the "forces of good" (going to be referred to as goodies for convince) was completely ruined and discredited by their choice of tactics.
Two points stuck out to me. First is that the goodies attempted to achieve their goals via censorship of music, movies, etc. that they find objectionable. I could go on all day about why censorship is bad in general and why, outside of obvious cases, I take a very dim on censorship in general, regardless of who's doing it.
The key takeaway is that the goodies attempting to use censorship to achieve their goals ultimately ruins and discredits their cause, especially since they never bother making new good-quality works to replace what they are attempting to take away.
Second is the presentation of outrageous opinions as facts without backing evidence that is concrete, making those opinions crumble to dust when scrutinized. I point to two examples.
The first is the Jack Chick tract regarding Dungeons and Dragons. The tract, which asserts that the game is a Satanic invention designed to do various evil things, appears to be made as if Mr. Chick never did any research at all on the subject. This has the result of actually making the game even more popular once the tract fell apart under scrutiny and was ruthlessly mocked.
The other example is the PRMC hearings. During those hearings, Twisted Sister's face-of-the-band Dee Snider utterly humiliated Al Gore and his censorious colleges by being a lot more well-spoken than his appearance might suggest while viciously scrutinizing and dismantling the PRMC's arguments and lies. The result is that the "dirty music" that the PRMC sought to restrict exploded in popularity and that any attempts by the government or advocacy groups to restrict music gets looked at with distain and suspicion.
The moral of this story is that if you are going to make a statement, you better bring solid facts that will make what you say stand up to the harshest scrutiny. Otherwise, be prepared to be dismissed as an idiot.
I do think that if the goodies have more carefully strategized and planned out their attacks instead of relying in impulsive feelings, then they might not be so readily dismissed and mocked.
Thanks for the reply.
The "goodies" you speak of have nothing to do with what I am referring to. Those so-called goodies are a symptom of the problem as much as the other forces seeking to undermine and corrupt morals (i.e. Frankfurt school).
The one's I am talking about were working hard on instigating revival of the Christian spirit in America, not via censorship, but via promotion of a reorientation back towards Godly values. Censorship is not a godly value. It is an instrument of the establishment.
So while your hot take is interesting and has some good points to make, it's got nothing to do with what I am talking about.
During the 70's, someone was very controversial in speaking out about the "three headaches of God", when it came to America. (i.e. what made it difficult for God to bless and preserve America)
One was the moral corruption of youth - how this has proved true - the primary work of the Frankfurt school was instrumental in destroying morality in the USA. Today, the USA is rightly seen as the primary exporter of corrupt morals around the world.
Another was the decline of Christianity and a true christian (religious) spirit in the US. (Gore, his wife and their ilk are caricatures of Christian faith, imo.) Sacrifice and service by example, those are real Christian values, not preaching or censoring.
The third was the infiltration of Marxism and communism into all aspects of American life: from politics, to the media, to academia, institutions, and ideology. Again, history has shown that this was in fact the case.
Who in the 1970's could have predicted a day when the entire US mainstream media establishment became a full-blown propaganda machine for communism, whether in the guise of Socialism or Globalism? Almost no one. But someone did. Very well known. And very persecuted.
If you know your American history, you might figure out who I'm talking about.
I really have no idea what you are talking about, although it appears that you are addressing this moral to me? If so, it's ironic, in as much as you have leapt to a rather spectacular (and wrong) conclusion as to who or what people I was alluding to.
(Gore? PRMC? Fake posturing goodies? Pulleeeease.)