Must watch. 👀 https://truthsocial.com/users/annvandersteel/statuses/110196900004325201
Ann Vandersteel.
Breaking: Federal Public Officials found with no Oath of Office on file. (Big names have no oath to the Constitution on file.)
Writ of Quo Warrento filed with U.S. attorney in Washington, DC. They have to provide an affidavit to the DC court and attorney in 10 days or get replaced or immediately terminated…per 5 U.S. code 3332. (If I read it right.)
Vice President
Sec. of Defense
Sec. of Treasury
Sec. of Health and Human Services
Sec. of Energy
Sec. of Education
Sec. of Commerce
Sec. of State
Sec. of Labor and Transportation
Department of Homeland Security
Attorney General
Food and Drug Commissioner
CDC Director
And so on…
WH’s got ‘em coming and going…again. If they refuse to pledge an oath to the Constitution, they get replaced (and maybe jailed). If they do pledge an oath to the Constitution, they can be held accountable for their (past?) and future actions. And piss off their handlers.
Its amazing that this case is like a sacred cow to so many here. Such that anyone who doesn't immediately embrace it is personally skewered. This place is filled with analyzing and critiquing opinions/data and debating the merits or lack thereof. Except with this Brunson case. Nobody responds with an actual argument. It is the people who pointed out the lack of a cognizable claim in the suit that must be the problem apparently.
But there actually was a Claim, it was Lack of Performance in a Contract, which is also Breach of Contract....
The Fact that SCOTUS rejected it, should tell us that SCOTUS probably understood, just didn't want to get involved....
https://greatawakening.win/p/16amwDFHv8/x/c/4TsaJ83qzvU
I think this goes where I am trying to point you. I addressed this in a reply to u/bubble_bursts.
Ok, well the very first part where you are blatantly wrong, not just mistaken, but wrong, is that the Various Constitutions is ""Calling the Constitution a “contract” is more of a philosophical analogy than it is a legal argument."", there is NO Philosophical Analogy there, it is in fact recognized as a Valid Contract with Standing, although it is a Contract between the Various States and their Agent, the U.S. Govt....
Just as the State Constitutions are Valid Contracts between the State Governments and the various Villages, Towns, Counties, etc., of which the State Govt is their Agent, and so on and so on....
Then at the very TOP/BASE of it all, is the People....
But things got flipped when the U.S. Army Conquered and Subjugated, ALL the states in one felled swoop, gee, Thanks Lincoln....
My ONLY Point between this case and the Brunson Case, is this:: IF they got together, and combined both cases, in a LOGICAL MANNER, using reason and Critical thinking, they might be able to come up with a case that would stick, mainly because they SEEM to compliment each other....
nothing more than that....
It's not even an argument for or against anything, it's just an idea that I put out as a flat statement....