Must watch. 👀 https://truthsocial.com/users/annvandersteel/statuses/110196900004325201
Ann Vandersteel.
Breaking: Federal Public Officials found with no Oath of Office on file. (Big names have no oath to the Constitution on file.)
Writ of Quo Warrento filed with U.S. attorney in Washington, DC. They have to provide an affidavit to the DC court and attorney in 10 days or get replaced or immediately terminated…per 5 U.S. code 3332. (If I read it right.)
Vice President
Sec. of Defense
Sec. of Treasury
Sec. of Health and Human Services
Sec. of Energy
Sec. of Education
Sec. of Commerce
Sec. of State
Sec. of Labor and Transportation
Department of Homeland Security
Attorney General
Food and Drug Commissioner
CDC Director
And so on…
WH’s got ‘em coming and going…again. If they refuse to pledge an oath to the Constitution, they get replaced (and maybe jailed). If they do pledge an oath to the Constitution, they can be held accountable for their (past?) and future actions. And piss off their handlers.
This is the exact same thing as both Brunson cases. One was flat out denied twice by the Supreme Court and the other is waiting in Utah SC to move to the US SC.
Not "exactly the same thing". In Brunson's case its about not carrying out their duties. This will probably be a complement to that case.
Stop right there, especially after we have spent the last 3 years listening to "serious medical minds".
I listened to serious medical minds tell us that all the covid bs was bs. But I didn't even need that. It was pretty apparent.
Show me a single serious legal mind that actually believes this suit is viable. I am skeptical that there is even one. But even a blind hog gets an acorn sometimes so there is probably 1 or 2 guys claiming so. A first year undergrad pre-law student would fail if they turned in that lawsuit. You don't have to like it. You are free to wish this suit did something. But living in reality is a lot better than actually believing this was going somewhere. At least don't send these clowns money. Don't let them grift off your righteous indignation and hope for accountability.
It's very simple: If a person is elected, appointed, or hired to public office, then a DUTY arises to take an oath of office to support and defend the Constitution.
If said person fails to uphold that duty, then there MUST be a remedy.
In my mind, the remedy MUST be to lose any authority they would otherwise have, and be removed from office.
Of course, I do believe that such claim must be proven in a court of law, but to take the position that nothing at all should be done is what has put us into the current unacceptable position.
As for "legal minds," not 1 attorney in 10,000 had the fucking balls to file a single lawsuit against the tyrannical and unconstitutional usurpation of power and trampling of human rights during the Covid scam. So, please forgive us if we don't give a fuck what the "legal minds" think, since they have outted themselves as lazy cowards.
What you are saying is that you are fine with fighting lawlessness with lawlessness and that is antithetical to anything Q said. The ends justifies the means. This philosophy is how we got here.
There is no duty in the sense that it is actionable under some form of contract law or tort claim. It just isn't. No matter how mad you are that they did this, suing under these legal theories is just dumb. Because its non sensical and totally not legally viable. These guys have to know this, too. They are grifting off of it. The last 2-3 pages of their complaint are their 6 causes of action. Don't read the rest of what they wrote because it has no bearing on their causes of action. It is written specifically to capture your attention because it tells a story of egregious fuckery that occurred in the 2020 election and the aftermath leading to the electoral college certification. None of it relates to the 6 claims they make.
The fact of the matter that nobody is discussing is that the Electoral Count Act itself has better than 90% odds of being unconstitutional. It is antithetical to the plain language of the 12th amendment. That amendment requires the counting of the electors and provides no form of rejecting them by Congress. It is the state legislatures from those problem states who (1) had the power to fix the fuckery; and (2) had a duty to fix the fuckery. Those were not named in their lawsuit.
Well if the Brunson Case is complimentary to this, and Vice Versa, then what is YOUR malfunction???
Its amazing that this case is like a sacred cow to so many here. Such that anyone who doesn't immediately embrace it is personally skewered. This place is filled with analyzing and critiquing opinions/data and debating the merits or lack thereof. Except with this Brunson case. Nobody responds with an actual argument. It is the people who pointed out the lack of a cognizable claim in the suit that must be the problem apparently.
Not exactly the same. The Brunson case says they broke their oaths. This one says they didnt even take the oath. What if SCOTUS shelved the Brunson case because they knew these people didnt take the oath?
What IF they take Both Cases in tandem???
Precisely and you are correct.
Brunson's two cases hinge on government servants breaking their oaths while this makes a claim they do not have an oath on record to the respective offices that they serve.
So how can SCOTUS take a case claiming they broke an oath they never even took? I can definitely see this as being a two part op with one overall goal.
Agreed. I think both have merit, but the actual carrying out of these outcomes would rip the country in half. I’m guilty of wanting this to happen, to see all these criminal marched out in chains, but at what cost to keeping the country in one piece.
Correct. This is the crux of the problem humanity has been facing in general.
This is also why the Q team is letting the Evil take us all to the precipice.
Only at the precipice where people truly believe they are in the brink of destruction, will their selfish love for preservation kicks in at a gear high enough to open their mind to anything that can save them, including return of Trump. I believe these cases are lined up for that.
I find myself agreeing with you a lot.
Don't worry, you will be cured in due time! 🤣
Who ever said we WANTED to keep the mess in one piece???
Nope, we want the separations to happen, we Want the strife and chaos and fights to happen so we can finally lay to rest the idea that Leftists should be allowed to make any manner of decisions for the rest of the public....
In this way, we can finally destroy MOB RULE over Individual Rights, and it IS the only way for this to happen, through a hard line struggle, no Prisoners style....
Yes!! Exactly- the first thing that came to mind