Must watch. 👀 https://truthsocial.com/users/annvandersteel/statuses/110196900004325201
Ann Vandersteel.
Breaking: Federal Public Officials found with no Oath of Office on file. (Big names have no oath to the Constitution on file.)
Writ of Quo Warrento filed with U.S. attorney in Washington, DC. They have to provide an affidavit to the DC court and attorney in 10 days or get replaced or immediately terminated…per 5 U.S. code 3332. (If I read it right.)
Vice President
Sec. of Defense
Sec. of Treasury
Sec. of Health and Human Services
Sec. of Energy
Sec. of Education
Sec. of Commerce
Sec. of State
Sec. of Labor and Transportation
Department of Homeland Security
Attorney General
Food and Drug Commissioner
CDC Director
And so on…
WH’s got ‘em coming and going…again. If they refuse to pledge an oath to the Constitution, they get replaced (and maybe jailed). If they do pledge an oath to the Constitution, they can be held accountable for their (past?) and future actions. And piss off their handlers.
Go back and read what I said and you will understand I never said a lawsuit is going to fix it. I keep using two words - precipice and devolution. Feel free to keep ignoring anything that does not fit with the matrix. But this lawsuit is just one tool and its an end game tool, and works in conjunction with the precipice and devolution.
If you thing you have anything further to add, first do the courtesy of answering the simple questions I asked. I am not gonna read your word vomit any further.
Its such a great tool it gets laughed out of court and only people here without a clue think it will go somewhere. Why do you think that complete dipshits with no idea how to write a lawsuit getting smoked out of court faster than a morning shit getting flushed down the toilet and then grifting off of it is an effective tool? The only people it is effective for is them. Cuz they profit off of ignorance and hope.
Lawsuits get laughed out of court
Doctors who tell the truth get laughed out of medical communities
Trump gets laughed out by the main stream media
Need I keep going?
News Flash: You are in the community that never measures their actions by whether the rest of the society laughs at us or not. In fact the very opposite.
Like I said, talking to you feels the exact same way as when I talk to people with medical background on Reddit about covid and vaccines.
Here is something I find laughable - that you have convinced yourself that elected members can never be held responsible for their actions by the people.
Even more funny is you thinking I said that. Because I am clearly talking way above your head you do not have any idea what I am telling you. This is why you cling to cope and hopium like fuckin Brunson. And when I point it out you reeeee like a leftist.
I thought we were having an adult discussion. But no. You were attacking me. For no real reason. I guess because you have no substance to dispute what I'm saying. If you do, you never say it. Just more cope and hopium. Buffoonery of the highest order.
I gave you the fuckin blueprint for how elected members get held accountable by the people. Take back your local government. Then you can unwind this. You cannot unwind it with cope and hopium. Brunson is just going to laugh his way to his bank to cash all the checks from dipshits like you that think he's doing anything except grifting off your hopium.
You are so clueless you think there is some alternative Constitutional theory to do this. There isn't. Take back your local government or we all go to the camps. Period.
When the DOJ abdicates responsibility to investigate and prosecute fraud, you can't pass the buck to Congress. Does Congress have law enforcement powers? No. When you bring a dud of a lawsuit to the Supreme Court, you cannot blame them for booting it if you are in favor of the rule of law. A lack of a viable remedy does not suddenly manifest whatever remedy you can conceive of out of whatever legal theory you can dream up or hallucinate. You don't have to like it. You have to accept it. Or you will never resolve the issue.
Do you subscribe to Q's statement that everything must be done abiding by the rule of law? Yes or no? I just told you what the law is. You have nothing you can point to to dispute it. Besides that you don't like what I told you so you want to imagine some other way. But not taking back your local government. Some other means of a remedy that is not existing under the law.
Courts cannot compel prosecutions. Courts cannot remove members of Congress. The executive cannot remove members of Congress. Its called separation of powers. And they have exploited this to our detriment. If you believe in the rule of law to fix this, none of what you are saying is lawful. So you have to go get a state prosecutor to start blowing up voting mules. To prosecute corrupt officials. And to clean out the election apparatus such that the will of the people is reflected. If you do this, you can then elect uncucked members of Congress and a President that will uncuck the DOJ and start going after these guys. That is the only way. Except if you are you. Then somehow a dumbass named Brunson is secretly working a strategy tying in to some other unproven theory.
Put the pipe down dude. And for god's sake there is no need to be this undignified in an adult conversation.
See, this is why I asked you to give explicit answers to those questions because you are not the first slippery eel I have dealt with. And you know this, because you tried to dodge answering them until I told you I would disengage if you didn't.