Maybe that COULD be part of it! /s
(twitter.com)
Comments (7)
sorted by:
To them it is a shell game. Lose money in one company and they move onto the next. The goal is the message and psy ops conditioning by repeated exposure over a long period of time.
The Cabal/DS play the long game. But their current time table is truncated as it was forced.
There's always a flip side to this. A good effect that counters the bad effect. In this case I would think it would be that there's a visible chink in the armor. The awakened can see how much their boycott has an effect and it gives them more motivation to be proactive knowing that there are many out there seeing things the same way. This is something new. I think something like this 10 years ago would have had people doing the same thing but without the noticeable effect of major loss of revenue. All in all, I see this as a sum gain situation.
I was thinking a similar thought.
To us, it doesn't matter how much money Budweiser or AB loses.
It's about standing up for what is Right and rejecting what is Wrong.
This is Anti-Propaganda: Negative Reaction to Propaganda reinforces the Good Truth.
Compared to the Evil Opposite: where propaganda successfully and covertly influences the minds of the unaware.
Now we have a clear example for the whole world to see.
HUMANITY
REJECTS
TRANSEXUALS.
Gee, did junior ever go there like his sister? I can't believe he is defending Bud Light. So disgusted over him right now
C'mon, he is just being fair in getting out the real reasons why the company did it. Don't be so quick to throw our allies off the bus.
Is there any corporation not partnered with the WEF? Their "partners" list seems to include almost all well-known brands.
It is truly eye-opening to see companies make objectively bad marketing decisions. Sometimes you can give the benefit of the doubt and chalk it up to one bad employee or team within a large company, and now the company doesn't want to take sides either way by walking it back in a grand way or doubling down. But then other times, that excuse no longer flies. This bud light thing is one of those times. Taking on a brand partner that so obviously does not jive with your target demographic? What the fuck are you doing? It's obviously malicious.
Especially when all of this shit happened suddenly. Literally nobody knew this Dylan guy before this. It's not like they partnered with a real celebrity who happens to have controversy. They made a celebrity for this controversy. And nobody was talking about trannies more than just in passing or on weird forums last year. But now they're all that we're talking about. It's clearly manufactured.