Flat Earther spends $20,000 on DIY experiment that accidentally proved the planet is ROUND
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
🌏 Sphere World 🌎
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (308)
sorted by:
To your first claim, it's bullshit, you can see the curvature from much lower, which you would know if you had ever been up in a small aircraft, like, the kind with flat windows you can slide back, or even the kind you can remove the doors. You claimed earlier to have "looked hard for proof" but you didn't think to go up in the air and look? Pretty fishy.
Now, let's look at my claim- The globalists created the Flat Earth conspiracy to make a mockery of all other conspiracies. What would the motive be? To discredit people who are actually on to the truth of something, like the CIA murdering JFK, or that Global Warming is a lie, by comparing them to people who believe something disproven hundreds of years ago. Now, let's entertain your claim- the Globalists have been conspiring for hundreds of years to convince people to believe that our planet is a globe like everything else in the solar system (guess they had an easy job), so they can........ What? Where is the motive?
You're literally contradicting the globalist cabal-endorsed, #1 GLOBE DEFENDER in the world, Neil Degrasse Tyson. Not to mention your own god-given vision. Nobody can see curvature from commercial aircraft. This is a fully established fact that none of the professional globe defenders in the world deny.
The CIA, aka Jesuit, conspiracy started long before any of us were born. You're literally in denial.
The motive is two-fold. First, to make you feel small and insignificant, as just a random, accidental conglomeration of star dust - denial of a creator. And second, to keep you locked into believing you can only travel between the 6 continents that they allow you to move between.
There's not a one of you here on the GA board that has the slightest clue on this subject. The levels of DENIAL are astounding. Not a one of your arguments has even been valid for at least the past 3 years. The globe community has been reduced to "muh gravity", "muh refraction" and "Muh mathematical models" and "muh observations". This is where the debate hinges today.