Regarding Gleason's map, it is a conclusive Fail. Antarctica is the fringe around the edge. You are averting your eyes from the fact that he specified in his patent description that it was a projection of a globe. The distortions get greater the farther from the North Pole they are on the map. Cannot be reconciled with local "flattish" maps.

The South Pole exists and was in fact confirmed by observations of solar motion. It is where the sun maintains a constant elevation angle in the sky (during the day of course).

Every word about the International Space Station is true, especially the fact that you can see it going overhead.

You have given up on the gyrocompass, I see. Either too complicated to understand, or the implications are too damning to accept. You have no connection to reality. You cannot deal with commonly observed experience; you just deny it all. This is a mental problem, including psychological projection where you lay all your traits on me. You will notice that I don't shun any topic, and have a ready and coherent answer. I can point out where the "flat Earth" hypothesis unravels. You have no ability to defend it. You come up with Gleason's map, which turns out to be a fraud, by his own words.

You have locked yourself into a private world. I can only wonder what crisis will break you out of it. Meanwhile, THE REST OF THE WORLD proceeds to live on a globe and thrives on account of it. Adios.