I'm an engineer, not a flat earther. I'm an '"Elon" fan (or whomever is acting that part) and I follow him daily on Twitter. I believe without doubt that the Apollo missions were faked. But I worry about the lame thermal wrapping on this rocket engine, very reminiscent of the 1968 lunar lander prop; and about the scratchy audio on the commentator. She's not in space, so why is her audio so 1966? These days I automatically question everything I see, particularly if it is not censored on mainstream platforms like YT.
I remember listening to some talk show interview and the person claimed that there was a second mission at the same time as a backup because at the time space travel was still super dangerous. What they claimed was basically what Q said..the public footage was faked however the landing was real and a secret mission or project or whatever.
I agree. My point is, people who think we never went to moon because the public tech was so stupidly primitive at that time - they are half correct and half wrong.
The public footage was faked but the landings were real.
I'm an engineer, not a flat earther. I'm an '"Elon" fan (or whomever is acting that part) and I follow him daily on Twitter. I believe without doubt that the Apollo missions were faked. But I worry about the lame thermal wrapping on this rocket engine, very reminiscent of the 1968 lunar lander prop; and about the scratchy audio on the commentator. She's not in space, so why is her audio so 1966? These days I automatically question everything I see, particularly if it is not censored on mainstream platforms like YT.
u/#q2225
I remember listening to some talk show interview and the person claimed that there was a second mission at the same time as a backup because at the time space travel was still super dangerous. What they claimed was basically what Q said..the public footage was faked however the landing was real and a secret mission or project or whatever.
I agree. My point is, people who think we never went to moon because the public tech was so stupidly primitive at that time - they are half correct and half wrong.
The public footage was faked but the landings were real.
Though, I reject the notion that we somehow can't get there again because of "forgotten tech".
Bring us there, dammit. Imagine getting new material decades apart, with better collection tech and more capacity.
We should be aiming to set foot on the moon again, and yet none of these companies do.
The moon also makes sense as a launching point for heavier payloads as required thrust to get off the ground would be less.
If we could colonize the moon, it would pay off in very interesting ways.
If we are worried about radiation out in the vacuum, then we aren't prepared for Mars either.
Additionally, once again, I don't know why we don't offer a trip to space for the progression of science to death row inmates.
It's not cruel, it's not unusual, and it's not a reward. They will die up there, it's just a matter of what data we can collect until they do.