This is what makes me conclude that there was some urgent reason why the Cabal needed to launch to Moon. They did not even have proper optics cover for this OP, hence such horrible optics as Apollo.
Even today, with SpaceX in the public's mind for all these years, they still dont have the optics to cover the real tech needed to launch to Moon.
I think of Moon as Antarctia. A base for the controllers of Earth.
We cannot do it because the real astronauts that went died in the radiation. Everything else was to cover this up. And if they send anyone else up there it will only confirm to the public that man never stepped on the moon. We may have landed a vessel on the moon but the bodies that were inside were cooked to a crisp.
Because the thermosphere is essentially hard vacuum and there is no heat capacity to speak of. Temperature doesn't mean much if there aren't very many molecules to carry it.
Incredible bullshit. They zipped through the Van Allen belts at thousands of miles per hour. The belts were never a problem for the probes we sent through it. They did not destroy our first satellite, Explorer 1, which discovered the belts. This is the sort of grotesque fantasy that can come only from someone who is completely ignorant of the situation.
On NAZAs own website, the videos of the Orion project clearly stated that the van Allen belts pose a severe design challenge. 6' thick lead walls weighs as much as a giant blob of lead
Oh...NASA is a liar...but you believe their public relations video? Actual scientific information need not apply? Are you sure they are not referring to long-term exposure to cosmic rays? Or to exposure to the drive system radiation?
Though, I reject the notion that we somehow can't get there again because of "forgotten tech".
Bring us there, dammit. Imagine getting new material decades apart, with better collection tech and more capacity.
We should be aiming to set foot on the moon again, and yet none of these companies do.
The moon also makes sense as a launching point for heavier payloads as required thrust to get off the ground would be less.
If we could colonize the moon, it would pay off in very interesting ways.
If we are worried about radiation out in the vacuum, then we aren't prepared for Mars either.
Additionally, once again, I don't know why we don't offer a trip to space for the progression of science to death row inmates.
It's not cruel, it's not unusual, and it's not a reward. They will die up there, it's just a matter of what data we can collect until they do.
This is what makes me conclude that there was some urgent reason why the Cabal needed to launch to Moon. They did not even have proper optics cover for this OP, hence such horrible optics as Apollo.
Even today, with SpaceX in the public's mind for all these years, they still dont have the optics to cover the real tech needed to launch to Moon.
I think of Moon as Antarctia. A base for the controllers of Earth.
LOL it's definitely unusual, and it's definitely a reward if they're gonna die anyway.
We cannot do it because the real astronauts that went died in the radiation. Everything else was to cover this up. And if they send anyone else up there it will only confirm to the public that man never stepped on the moon. We may have landed a vessel on the moon but the bodies that were inside were cooked to a crisp.
Arent there ways to block radiation?
Obviously 3 layers of aluminum foil with cardboard flaps should do it. Wait what is the temperature of the thermosphere? Why didn’t the tin foil melt?
Because the thermosphere is essentially hard vacuum and there is no heat capacity to speak of. Temperature doesn't mean much if there aren't very many molecules to carry it.
That’s like saying there is a suit you can wear that will protect you when you step on the sun. That amount of radiation idk
What amount of radiation? Cough up a number, before you make ridiculous comparisons. Ever had an X-ray? Did you burst into flames?
Do you think radiation is what kills you at the sun? Do you think the maybe the radiation would be less at a great distance from the sun?
Incredible bullshit. They zipped through the Van Allen belts at thousands of miles per hour. The belts were never a problem for the probes we sent through it. They did not destroy our first satellite, Explorer 1, which discovered the belts. This is the sort of grotesque fantasy that can come only from someone who is completely ignorant of the situation.
On NAZAs own website, the videos of the Orion project clearly stated that the van Allen belts pose a severe design challenge. 6' thick lead walls weighs as much as a giant blob of lead
Oh...NASA is a liar...but you believe their public relations video? Actual scientific information need not apply? Are you sure they are not referring to long-term exposure to cosmic rays? Or to exposure to the drive system radiation?
We are gearing up for Mars missions, so I would expect us to resolve that.
Radiation is a problem for sure, x rays and gamma rays do penetrate through those suits so I'm not sure how it'd be handled actually.