I'm an engineer, not a flat earther. I'm an '"Elon" fan (or whomever is acting that part) and I follow him daily on Twitter. I believe without doubt that the Apollo missions were faked. But I worry about the lame thermal wrapping on this rocket engine, very reminiscent of the 1968 lunar lander prop; and about the scratchy audio on the commentator. She's not in space, so why is her audio so 1966? These days I automatically question everything I see, particularly if it is not censored on mainstream platforms like YT.
I remember listening to some talk show interview and the person claimed that there was a second mission at the same time as a backup because at the time space travel was still super dangerous. What they claimed was basically what Q said..the public footage was faked however the landing was real and a secret mission or project or whatever.
I agree. My point is, people who think we never went to moon because the public tech was so stupidly primitive at that time - they are half correct and half wrong.
The public footage was faked but the landings were real.
The public footage was real. Just because you don't understand what you saw doesn't mean it was faked. It showed phenomena that could only have been produced in lunar gravity and vacuum.
I'm an engineer, not a flat earther. I'm an '"Elon" fan (or whomever is acting that part) and I follow him daily on Twitter. I believe without doubt that the Apollo missions were faked. But I worry about the lame thermal wrapping on this rocket engine, very reminiscent of the 1968 lunar lander prop; and about the scratchy audio on the commentator. She's not in space, so why is her audio so 1966? These days I automatically question everything I see, particularly if it is not censored on mainstream platforms like YT.
u/#q2225
I remember listening to some talk show interview and the person claimed that there was a second mission at the same time as a backup because at the time space travel was still super dangerous. What they claimed was basically what Q said..the public footage was faked however the landing was real and a secret mission or project or whatever.
I agree. My point is, people who think we never went to moon because the public tech was so stupidly primitive at that time - they are half correct and half wrong.
The public footage was faked but the landings were real.
The public footage was real. Just because you don't understand what you saw doesn't mean it was faked. It showed phenomena that could only have been produced in lunar gravity and vacuum.