The public footage was real. Just because you don't understand what you saw doesn't mean it was faked. It showed phenomena that could only have been produced in lunar gravity and vacuum.
Yes, and if you you question anything, anything at all, you're a dunce. He has 40 years experience in the industry and such. I'm surprised he didn't remind you of his superior credentials and intellect yet. 😂
He really pisses me off. He only shows up in posts about outer space and then replies to every single comment he disagrees with, seemingly to convince every one of us of how smart he is. Anyone that needs that kind of reassurance is just a weak little bitch.
Oh nice, you are defending the "expert in everything" who passionately explained to every one why no one can shoot down the Chinese balloons - just one day before they were shot - based on his subject expertise! And todays later repeated the same thing with something else, not claiming a new subject expertise.
May I suggest not to butt into things you don't know?
I was only repeating past experience with guns---which no one could disprove. You will recall that many were expecting the balloon to be destroyed with a machine gun or cannon barrage (which never would have worked). I was happy to know they had a different approach.
No. From 40 years of aerospace engineering at a company that built the Lunar Orbiters, the first stage of the Saturn V, the Moon Buggy, and the Inertial Upper Stage. You have years of sideline spectator experience, right?
As a scuba diver I am amazed at the ability of our air to stay trapped right next to the infinite vacuum of sgayce without a hard shell tank like a dome. Space. Sorry even my spellcheck knows
It's called gravity. The atmosphere fades away with altitude. There is a tiny, tiny fraction of air molecules at the upper reaches of the atmosphere that have escape velocity and "boil off" into space. But this goes on for millions of years. That is where helium goes if we do not capture it for use.
That's not how pressure works. My tire has 35# regardless if I check the valve stem on top or bottom. My scuba tank doesn't settle high pressure to the bottom. All science that is reproducible somehow is flipped into opposite world when NAZA is involved. Gravity is still a theory because it cannot be proven. Buoyancy and density are science. Centrifuge or merry go rounds sling liquid to the outside just like the tires on my jeep. But spin me a ball at speeds that shreds oak trees and steel buildings and magically the water is pulled down still as a mirror. NY to LA is a 2 hour flight but LA to NY takes two days when NY comes up behind the plane just land. Long range shooters never calculate which direction they are facing. Never shoot a slow 45 cap due west unless you want to get smacked in the face with the bullet. It really is comical once you question what can't be reproduced. How many times have you heard that DJT always lies and Qanon is a cult conspiracy. When you ask for specifics all you get is everyone knows and its safe and effective. I had no idea the bible has hundreds of proofs for geocentric created model until I researched. Heliosorcery is a good start to see how Copernicus introduced his heliocentric theory just a few centuries ago
The ocean settles high pressure to the bottom, as you very well know. Same thing for the atmosphere. Gravity is proven because it is a fact. Is there a theory? We have Newton's Law and that has been good enough for centuries. Buoyancy relies entirely on gravity.
If you ever figure it out (it is possible, but you folks always seem incapable of doing it), the centrifugal acceleration from rotation is too small to notice personally (but does cause a bulge of the oceans at the equator). The atmosphere is being carried along with the surface of the Earth because it is a viscous fluid and all viscous fluids have a no-slip boundary condition at the surface. So, it is just carried along. North and south motions cause Coriolis effects such as cyclones and anticyclones. You have a bizarre notion about airplane flights, which differ east to west only because of headwinds, not from Earth's rotation.
Tires and scuba tanks are poor models for the earths atmosphere. Neither generate the same gravitational attraction as earth because are far less massive, and both of your examples are sealed on all sides. A sealed container will have equal pressure throughout, but earths atmosphere is not sealed by solid matter. The earths atmosphere is a balancing act between gravity pulling down and pressure pushing up.
gravity is a theory because it cannot be proven.
Tell me you don’t know what theories are without telling me you don’t know what theories are.
spin me a ball at speeds that shred oak trees and steel buildings and magically the water is pulled down.
What speed the earth spins at depends on what reference frame you’re using. From the perspective of oak trees and steel buildings, the earth doesn’t rotate at all relative to them. Furthermore, tangential velocity (the spin speeds flat earthers usually cite) is not useful when analyzing rotating objects; the far more important figure is angular velocity, which is used to calculate centrifugal force. Earths centrifugal force due to its spin is 0.033 m/s^2, compared to 9.81 for acceleration due to gravity. Gravity is over 290 times stronger. And that is at the equator, so the centripetal force decreases closer to the poles.
Imagine someone pushes you on a merry go round at a rate of one revolution per day. Not a very exciting ride, is it? That’s why the earths “insane rotating speeds” don’t matter, the earth spins at the exact same speed as that merry go round.
A bullet fired West is not going to be slammed back into the shooter because the shooter, gun, and bullet are all not moving relative to the earth before the bullet is fired. It’s for this reason that a bullet fired forward from a moving car doesn’t slam back into the car; the bullet was already traveling at the same speed as the car before it was fired. This idea is referred to as an inertial frame of reference.
So Qanon is ridiculous but flat earth isn’t? That’s a first. If anything Q has a lot more evidence in his favor than any flerfer.
The Bible has zero indication of agreeing with a flat earth model. Every alleged proof consists of flerfers retroactively reinterpreting cherry picked verses.
The public footage was real. Just because you don't understand what you saw doesn't mean it was faked. It showed phenomena that could only have been produced in lunar gravity and vacuum.
Let me guess, from years of experience as a Lunar launch specialist ?
Yes, and if you you question anything, anything at all, you're a dunce. He has 40 years experience in the industry and such. I'm surprised he didn't remind you of his superior credentials and intellect yet. 😂
He really pisses me off. He only shows up in posts about outer space and then replies to every single comment he disagrees with, seemingly to convince every one of us of how smart he is. Anyone that needs that kind of reassurance is just a weak little bitch.
I'll let you guys light up the room with your arrogance and pomposity. At least I have expertise to offer.
Oh nice, you are defending the "expert in everything" who passionately explained to every one why no one can shoot down the Chinese balloons - just one day before they were shot - based on his subject expertise! And todays later repeated the same thing with something else, not claiming a new subject expertise.
May I suggest not to butt into things you don't know?
I was only repeating past experience with guns---which no one could disprove. You will recall that many were expecting the balloon to be destroyed with a machine gun or cannon barrage (which never would have worked). I was happy to know they had a different approach.
I think it was sarcasm, bro. You both, and I, feel the same about this nutter. 🤭
I was being sarcastic. I think that guy is a dick. He mainly only comments on these types of posts in an attempt to debate people. I'm on your side.
No. From 40 years of aerospace engineering at a company that built the Lunar Orbiters, the first stage of the Saturn V, the Moon Buggy, and the Inertial Upper Stage. You have years of sideline spectator experience, right?
I have years of experience dealing with idiots.
Not applicable here.
As a scuba diver I am amazed at the ability of our air to stay trapped right next to the infinite vacuum of sgayce without a hard shell tank like a dome. Space. Sorry even my spellcheck knows
It's called gravity. The atmosphere fades away with altitude. There is a tiny, tiny fraction of air molecules at the upper reaches of the atmosphere that have escape velocity and "boil off" into space. But this goes on for millions of years. That is where helium goes if we do not capture it for use.
That's not how pressure works. My tire has 35# regardless if I check the valve stem on top or bottom. My scuba tank doesn't settle high pressure to the bottom. All science that is reproducible somehow is flipped into opposite world when NAZA is involved. Gravity is still a theory because it cannot be proven. Buoyancy and density are science. Centrifuge or merry go rounds sling liquid to the outside just like the tires on my jeep. But spin me a ball at speeds that shreds oak trees and steel buildings and magically the water is pulled down still as a mirror. NY to LA is a 2 hour flight but LA to NY takes two days when NY comes up behind the plane just land. Long range shooters never calculate which direction they are facing. Never shoot a slow 45 cap due west unless you want to get smacked in the face with the bullet. It really is comical once you question what can't be reproduced. How many times have you heard that DJT always lies and Qanon is a cult conspiracy. When you ask for specifics all you get is everyone knows and its safe and effective. I had no idea the bible has hundreds of proofs for geocentric created model until I researched. Heliosorcery is a good start to see how Copernicus introduced his heliocentric theory just a few centuries ago
The ocean settles high pressure to the bottom, as you very well know. Same thing for the atmosphere. Gravity is proven because it is a fact. Is there a theory? We have Newton's Law and that has been good enough for centuries. Buoyancy relies entirely on gravity.
If you ever figure it out (it is possible, but you folks always seem incapable of doing it), the centrifugal acceleration from rotation is too small to notice personally (but does cause a bulge of the oceans at the equator). The atmosphere is being carried along with the surface of the Earth because it is a viscous fluid and all viscous fluids have a no-slip boundary condition at the surface. So, it is just carried along. North and south motions cause Coriolis effects such as cyclones and anticyclones. You have a bizarre notion about airplane flights, which differ east to west only because of headwinds, not from Earth's rotation.
Tires and scuba tanks are poor models for the earths atmosphere. Neither generate the same gravitational attraction as earth because are far less massive, and both of your examples are sealed on all sides. A sealed container will have equal pressure throughout, but earths atmosphere is not sealed by solid matter. The earths atmosphere is a balancing act between gravity pulling down and pressure pushing up.
Tell me you don’t know what theories are without telling me you don’t know what theories are.
What speed the earth spins at depends on what reference frame you’re using. From the perspective of oak trees and steel buildings, the earth doesn’t rotate at all relative to them. Furthermore, tangential velocity (the spin speeds flat earthers usually cite) is not useful when analyzing rotating objects; the far more important figure is angular velocity, which is used to calculate centrifugal force. Earths centrifugal force due to its spin is 0.033 m/s^2, compared to 9.81 for acceleration due to gravity. Gravity is over 290 times stronger. And that is at the equator, so the centripetal force decreases closer to the poles.
Imagine someone pushes you on a merry go round at a rate of one revolution per day. Not a very exciting ride, is it? That’s why the earths “insane rotating speeds” don’t matter, the earth spins at the exact same speed as that merry go round.
A bullet fired West is not going to be slammed back into the shooter because the shooter, gun, and bullet are all not moving relative to the earth before the bullet is fired. It’s for this reason that a bullet fired forward from a moving car doesn’t slam back into the car; the bullet was already traveling at the same speed as the car before it was fired. This idea is referred to as an inertial frame of reference.
So Qanon is ridiculous but flat earth isn’t? That’s a first. If anything Q has a lot more evidence in his favor than any flerfer.
The Bible has zero indication of agreeing with a flat earth model. Every alleged proof consists of flerfers retroactively reinterpreting cherry picked verses.