Gonna play devil's advocate here.. Fauci didn't necessarily lie when he said he doesn't know how to use Twitter. When he "takes over someone's account" it probably means he's got some tech-savvy intern doing it for him, and he's telling them what to say. .............hold on a moment, maybe that's the loophole for him saying he doesn't know how to use Twitter, because if he is speaking through someone, that is technically him communicating on Twitter. So wow, even when attempting to play devil's advocate, I wound up realizing that Fauci was being deceitful in his side-stepping "answers."
It's all double speak and lawyer talk wrapped in as much plausible deniability as possible. They know exactly what they're doing, but they ensure they talk in an ambiguous way that allows them an exit.
Gonna play devil's advocate here.. Fauci didn't necessarily lie when he said he doesn't know how to use Twitter. When he "takes over someone's account" it probably means he's got some tech-savvy intern doing it for him, and he's telling them what to say. .............hold on a moment, maybe that's the loophole for him saying he doesn't know how to use Twitter, because if he is speaking through someone, that is technically him communicating on Twitter. So wow, even when attempting to play devil's advocate, I wound up realizing that Fauci was being deceitful in his side-stepping "answers."
It's all double speak and lawyer talk wrapped in as much plausible deniability as possible. They know exactly what they're doing, but they ensure they talk in an ambiguous way that allows them an exit.
I'm so tired of "plausible deniability" is a concept. They use it to skirt the law so many times.
The justice system as a whole needs modernization, since a jury will always be tainted now anyway.
Plausible Deniability always reminds me of Diplomatic Immunity —
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kwC_IaY3BmY&pp=ygUTZGlwbG9tYXRpYyBpbW11bml0eQ%3D%3D
.