He also mocked Catsfive, calling him a "gay Canadian CNN and Vice journalist...long-conning the entire community so he can do an exposé on the nutjobs to put the final nail in the coffin." His words, not mine.
Brings up an interesting point. There were "anons" long before Q. And all "anons" don't necessarily believe Q to be true. So I get their frustration and anger over all anons being associated with Q.
And I think at this point, all the facetious "who is this "qanon" you speak of?" is getting a bit silly. It's how the MSM is going to refer to us, no matter how we respond to it. Acting like we have no clue who they mean isn't accomplishing anything.
People claiming to be on your side will mock you as well.
I got told this today.
He also mocked Catsfive, calling him a "gay Canadian CNN and Vice journalist...long-conning the entire community so he can do an exposé on the nutjobs to put the final nail in the coffin." His words, not mine.
Brings up an interesting point. There were "anons" long before Q. And all "anons" don't necessarily believe Q to be true. So I get their frustration and anger over all anons being associated with Q.
And I think at this point, all the facetious "who is this "qanon" you speak of?" is getting a bit silly. It's how the MSM is going to refer to us, no matter how we respond to it. Acting like we have no clue who they mean isn't accomplishing anything.
I saw. What a sick puppy (apologies to puppies).