It's all "out there" and nobody uses it. Don't know any of these guys. Any textbooks? (Sorry about the mph/mpg; late night drowsies.) Patented? And nobody takes advantage of the patent? This is all very hard to credit. These things are not well known to the technical community at large. I worked for a large aerospace company that was a leading expert in the stabilization in large electrical discharges. I rather suspect they were aware of the relevant technologies.
You say the transmitter will scale up, but I'm not sure you know what that entails. Scale up to what power at what range? Moreover, you don't seem to understand that there is no economic utility in a technology that cannot recover its investment. You react like J.P. Morgan had no right to expect a return on his investment, which to me is just the old "evil Capitalist" trope.
"You react like J.P. Morgan had no right to expect a return on his investment, which to me is just the old "evil Capitalist" trope."
I think no such thing. He absolutely has a right to a return on his investment, and as the story goes, Tesla even said he will meter it so they can see a return, but JP Morgan shut it down anyways. But yes JP Morgan was an evil Capitalist. He was actually just a leiutenant of the Rothschilds and when he died it was exposed that he only owned ~15% of his holdings. Rothschild actually owned most of it. Roths have been raping this nation for centuries. I guess that's a myth also?
So you may have some understanding of this. Why is it that Fusion has been a decade away for 50 years yet we are still dumping money into it?
As for people using it. Sure there are. I have seen video of people experimenting with the carbeurator idea, hydrogen splitting on the fly (Stan Meyer) and many other things. The people that control the industries have too much to lose to allow any of these disruptive technologies into the market place. If you can't see that as a motivation for things being shelved and hidden then I would say you may be being disingenuous.
Ha! When I was in grad school in the 1970s, my professors (who were working in the area of thermonuclear fusion) told me that fusion power would always be 20 years away. That was because the DoE only funded it for the purpose of exploring fusion physics for the sake of better understanding how to design H-bombs. Here it is today, and nothing has changed, notwithstanding all the big experiments and bright ideas that seem to come to nothing. No government suppression. It is just a tough problem. So, yes, I do have some understanding of this.
The "disruptive technologies" arrive without being stopped. Notice they are not arriving for the Russians, or the French, or the Chinese, or the Israelis either. "Hydrogen splitting"? Are you referring to splitting the hydrogen from water molecules? A thermodynamic dead end, and will always be.
Your idea about industries is sheer myth. You don't like the idea that certain inventions are worthless, or that certain problems are wickedly difficult, because that would be too disappointing and depressing. Better to think that the Pot of Gold is being "hidden," because it keeps hope alive. Sorry, Charlie. Notice how SpaceX is putting NASA into eclipse? Shouldn't be happening, according to your mythology.
Makes more sense now. You are very set in your ways and because of your background will never have a mind open enough to see the other possibilities. Kind of like a normie to politics but from the science side. 20 years ago no one would believe the government was run by pedophiles and many still won't believe no matter how much evidence is put in front of them. Yet here we are.
Have you perused the Journal of Galilean Electrodynamics? Lots of alternatives to Einsteinian relativity. Have you read the work of Halton Arp ("Seeing Red")? Evidence of continual cosmic creation and a refutation of the argument for a Big Bang. Have you read the work of Frederick Kantor ("Information Mechanics")? A possible unification of quantum and relativity physics. No, I don't think you have even heard of these sources. Kind of like a normie to physics, but from the politics side.
So don't blow smoke at me about being "set in my ways" and "will never have a mind open enough." I was involved in the development of death rays, not Tesla.
It's all "out there" and nobody uses it. Don't know any of these guys. Any textbooks? (Sorry about the mph/mpg; late night drowsies.) Patented? And nobody takes advantage of the patent? This is all very hard to credit. These things are not well known to the technical community at large. I worked for a large aerospace company that was a leading expert in the stabilization in large electrical discharges. I rather suspect they were aware of the relevant technologies.
You say the transmitter will scale up, but I'm not sure you know what that entails. Scale up to what power at what range? Moreover, you don't seem to understand that there is no economic utility in a technology that cannot recover its investment. You react like J.P. Morgan had no right to expect a return on his investment, which to me is just the old "evil Capitalist" trope.
"You react like J.P. Morgan had no right to expect a return on his investment, which to me is just the old "evil Capitalist" trope."
I think no such thing. He absolutely has a right to a return on his investment, and as the story goes, Tesla even said he will meter it so they can see a return, but JP Morgan shut it down anyways. But yes JP Morgan was an evil Capitalist. He was actually just a leiutenant of the Rothschilds and when he died it was exposed that he only owned ~15% of his holdings. Rothschild actually owned most of it. Roths have been raping this nation for centuries. I guess that's a myth also?
So you may have some understanding of this. Why is it that Fusion has been a decade away for 50 years yet we are still dumping money into it?
As for people using it. Sure there are. I have seen video of people experimenting with the carbeurator idea, hydrogen splitting on the fly (Stan Meyer) and many other things. The people that control the industries have too much to lose to allow any of these disruptive technologies into the market place. If you can't see that as a motivation for things being shelved and hidden then I would say you may be being disingenuous.
Ha! When I was in grad school in the 1970s, my professors (who were working in the area of thermonuclear fusion) told me that fusion power would always be 20 years away. That was because the DoE only funded it for the purpose of exploring fusion physics for the sake of better understanding how to design H-bombs. Here it is today, and nothing has changed, notwithstanding all the big experiments and bright ideas that seem to come to nothing. No government suppression. It is just a tough problem. So, yes, I do have some understanding of this.
The "disruptive technologies" arrive without being stopped. Notice they are not arriving for the Russians, or the French, or the Chinese, or the Israelis either. "Hydrogen splitting"? Are you referring to splitting the hydrogen from water molecules? A thermodynamic dead end, and will always be.
Your idea about industries is sheer myth. You don't like the idea that certain inventions are worthless, or that certain problems are wickedly difficult, because that would be too disappointing and depressing. Better to think that the Pot of Gold is being "hidden," because it keeps hope alive. Sorry, Charlie. Notice how SpaceX is putting NASA into eclipse? Shouldn't be happening, according to your mythology.
Makes more sense now. You are very set in your ways and because of your background will never have a mind open enough to see the other possibilities. Kind of like a normie to politics but from the science side. 20 years ago no one would believe the government was run by pedophiles and many still won't believe no matter how much evidence is put in front of them. Yet here we are.
Have you perused the Journal of Galilean Electrodynamics? Lots of alternatives to Einsteinian relativity. Have you read the work of Halton Arp ("Seeing Red")? Evidence of continual cosmic creation and a refutation of the argument for a Big Bang. Have you read the work of Frederick Kantor ("Information Mechanics")? A possible unification of quantum and relativity physics. No, I don't think you have even heard of these sources. Kind of like a normie to physics, but from the politics side.
So don't blow smoke at me about being "set in my ways" and "will never have a mind open enough." I was involved in the development of death rays, not Tesla.