You can sue a justice for the same things you would sue anyone else for - e.g. if their dog runs wild and bites you - but you cannot sue them for actions related to their performance of their duties as justices. Search for "judicial immunity" for more info.
Yep. The Brunsons need a competent lawyer to help explain how the law actually works, because none of these cases have an actually plausible legal theory as their basis.
"Trying" without any practical sense of how to turn effort into actual success is worse than useless. "We had to do something" is the classic justification when an idiotic plan makes things worse instead of better.
You can sue a justice for the same things you would sue anyone else for - e.g. if their dog runs wild and bites you - but you cannot sue them for actions related to their performance of their duties as justices. Search for "judicial immunity" for more info.
Sooo dead on arrival then ..
Yep. The Brunsons need a competent lawyer to help explain how the law actually works, because none of these cases have an actually plausible legal theory as their basis.
At least they are trying. You are just here bitching.
Sometime God want us to try everything wrong and learn from it, the final one is the fruitful one.
You have no idea who I am or what I'm doing.
"Trying" without any practical sense of how to turn effort into actual success is worse than useless. "We had to do something" is the classic justification when an idiotic plan makes things worse instead of better.