I'm done believing in viruses until somebody shows me one actually make someone sick and can prove it's the cause and not the effect of illness. Until then, it's parasites, bacteria, metals, poisons, and radiation. Nothing else.
You may be on to something here. Something is being "engineered" to cause illness and maybe it is called a "virus", but a naturally occurring alive "virus" has never been isolated or recorded on video.
The fact that they biologically don't fit into any normal animal kingdom classification per typical classic Biology is a strong indicator that they may be completely fabricated as cover for something else that is making us ill. Viruses as described appear to have no natural biological reason to exist.
And the well-documented use of "smallpox virus" over 200+ years as a defacto biological weapon by the elites against disfavored populations is a strong indicator that they actually "engineered" it, whatever it really is.
I mean, when you really think about it, viruses are kind of like medical unicorns. Nobody has ever actually seen one. The entire premise behind their existence makes reason stare I mean, how often have you heard since you've been alive "Viruses aren't actually living things, so you can't kill them. That's why, when you 'catch' a cold or flu, you just have to let it 'run its course."
And yet, this "not alive" thing reproduces? It's computer jargon applied to living cells. What the hell is it?
And then you see these videos of former virologists admitting, after they see how studies in other fields are done, that they have no actual proof that viruses are actually there and cause anything. That they're all based on models and assumptions and you go..."Huh.."
What other non-living thing reproduces? And what the hell do they mean by "it just has to run its course" anyway? If that's the case, how could a vaccine help? By training your white blood cells to recognize the virus so they can do what, exactly? Kill it? Don't they always say a vaccine contains a "dead" version of the virus in question? But I've always heard it said it can't be killed because it's not alive so where did they find this "dead" version of it? What does a "dead" virus look like? And what the hell does the immune system "learn" from a "dead" version of something that wasn't alive anyway? And now we find out that all these treatments that kill parasites shorten the lifespan of supposed virus-borne illnesses?
The whole thing stinks based on what I've always been told about it my entire life. Unless their claims on this matter have changed recently.
I'm done believing in viruses until somebody shows me one actually make someone sick and can prove it's the cause and not the effect of illness. Until then, it's parasites, bacteria, metals, poisons, and radiation. Nothing else.
You may be on to something here. Something is being "engineered" to cause illness and maybe it is called a "virus", but a naturally occurring alive "virus" has never been isolated or recorded on video.
The fact that they biologically don't fit into any normal animal kingdom classification per typical classic Biology is a strong indicator that they may be completely fabricated as cover for something else that is making us ill. Viruses as described appear to have no natural biological reason to exist.
And the well-documented use of "smallpox virus" over 200+ years as a defacto biological weapon by the elites against disfavored populations is a strong indicator that they actually "engineered" it, whatever it really is.
I mean, when you really think about it, viruses are kind of like medical unicorns. Nobody has ever actually seen one. The entire premise behind their existence makes reason stare I mean, how often have you heard since you've been alive "Viruses aren't actually living things, so you can't kill them. That's why, when you 'catch' a cold or flu, you just have to let it 'run its course."
And yet, this "not alive" thing reproduces? It's computer jargon applied to living cells. What the hell is it?
And then you see these videos of former virologists admitting, after they see how studies in other fields are done, that they have no actual proof that viruses are actually there and cause anything. That they're all based on models and assumptions and you go..."Huh.."
What other non-living thing reproduces? And what the hell do they mean by "it just has to run its course" anyway? If that's the case, how could a vaccine help? By training your white blood cells to recognize the virus so they can do what, exactly? Kill it? Don't they always say a vaccine contains a "dead" version of the virus in question? But I've always heard it said it can't be killed because it's not alive so where did they find this "dead" version of it? What does a "dead" virus look like? And what the hell does the immune system "learn" from a "dead" version of something that wasn't alive anyway? And now we find out that all these treatments that kill parasites shorten the lifespan of supposed virus-borne illnesses?
The whole thing stinks based on what I've always been told about it my entire life. Unless their claims on this matter have changed recently.
Agreed. I don’t know the full truth about viruses yet, but they are very very suspect now to me.