He can buy whatever he wants. He can also afford any security he wants.
That being said, if he WASN'T POTUS, in some way, he could be seen with far less of a security detail. To date, he has not. Former POTUS don't have as much as Trump has. You'd think that at least once he'd be seen with far less security, if he were just a former POTUS.
In the end, this video proves nothing. It also doesn't prove he's not, in some way, still POTUS. Make sense? Until I see him without the security, I will question, "Why does a former POTUS have the security detail of a sitting POTUS?" Is it because he can afford them, or because they can't afford to leave him unprotected?
He can buy whatever he wants. He can also afford any security he wants.
That being said, if he WASN'T POTUS, in some way, he could be seen with far less of a security detail. To date, he has not. Former POTUS don't have as much as Trump has. You'd think that at least once he'd be seen with far less security, if he were just a former POTUS.
In the end, this video proves nothing. It also doesn't prove he's not, in some way, still POTUS. Make sense? Until I see him without the security, I will question, "Why does a former POTUS have the security detail of a sitting POTUS?" Is it because he can afford them, or because they can't afford to leave him unprotected?