It's an armored vehicle. Do you expect Trump to ride in a Honda Civic? Yes, it is beastly, but even if he was a former POTUS, he could have one of these. This proves nothing, other than the fact he isn't stupid.
I can think of many reasons to believe he is still POTUS in one form or another, but nothing here is slam dunk evidence.
Do past Potus get this kind of security vehicle? I get he could pay for it himself but that is one hell of a security detail for an ex Potus. Has anyone ever seen Barak with this?
He can buy whatever he wants. He can also afford any security he wants.
That being said, if he WASN'T POTUS, in some way, he could be seen with far less of a security detail. To date, he has not. Former POTUS don't have as much as Trump has. You'd think that at least once he'd be seen with far less security, if he were just a former POTUS.
In the end, this video proves nothing. It also doesn't prove he's not, in some way, still POTUS. Make sense? Until I see him without the security, I will question, "Why does a former POTUS have the security detail of a sitting POTUS?" Is it because he can afford them, or because they can't afford to leave him unprotected?
I'm sorry, but the man puts it down, picks it up, then walks the other way. Also, please go look at what the NF looks like.
Came here to say that. Watch the vid, do not analyze the photo by itself.
Iām mostly talking about that vehicle. That is 100% beast!
It's an armored vehicle. Do you expect Trump to ride in a Honda Civic? Yes, it is beastly, but even if he was a former POTUS, he could have one of these. This proves nothing, other than the fact he isn't stupid.
I can think of many reasons to believe he is still POTUS in one form or another, but nothing here is slam dunk evidence.
Do past Potus get this kind of security vehicle? I get he could pay for it himself but that is one hell of a security detail for an ex Potus. Has anyone ever seen Barak with this?
He can buy whatever he wants. He can also afford any security he wants.
That being said, if he WASN'T POTUS, in some way, he could be seen with far less of a security detail. To date, he has not. Former POTUS don't have as much as Trump has. You'd think that at least once he'd be seen with far less security, if he were just a former POTUS.
In the end, this video proves nothing. It also doesn't prove he's not, in some way, still POTUS. Make sense? Until I see him without the security, I will question, "Why does a former POTUS have the security detail of a sitting POTUS?" Is it because he can afford them, or because they can't afford to leave him unprotected?