💥I All 9 Supreme Court justices push back on oversight: 'Raises more questions,' Senate chair says - The Great Awakening

💥I All 9 Supreme Court justices push back on oversight: 'Raises more questions,' Senate chair says (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 1 year ago by 7Nick9 1 year ago by 7Nick9 +216 / -0

53 comments download

53 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (53)

sorted by:

▲ 12 ▼

– Monomial 12 points 1 year ago +12 / -0

There's no actual evidence of corruption in the outcome of any case or even the appearance of corruption in any case.

Really? Not even an appearance of corruption? That is completely and totally false. There is a mountain of "appearance of corruption" in their refusal to take on Texas v. Pennsylvania in the election fraud of 2020.

These radical left media outlets just lie whenever they feel like it. I get that you have to prove actual corruption, and it's never been proven. But appearance of corruption is very evident to anyone who read that disgusting opinion.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 8 ▼

– inspoken 8 points 1 year ago +8 / -0

I assume that when they over state something with lots of unnecessary adjectives ("no actual evidence of", "even the appearance of") to the point where it's impossible they are trying to tell the reader that the exact opposite is true but there is someone holding a gun to their head as they type.

You know like the old Freudian slip by Freud himself: “I can certainly recommend the Gestapo to everyone” - Sigmund Freud, 1938

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q