Artificial Womb - wtf.jpg
(en.m.wikipedia.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Science:
Because you can Not necessarily because you should
Gender equality and LGBT
In the 1970 book The Dialectic of Sex, feminist Shulamith Firestone wrote that differences in biological reproductive roles are a source of gender inequality. Firestone singled out pregnancy and childbirth, making the argument that an artificial womb would free "women from the tyranny of their reproductive biology."[33][34]
Arathi Prasad argues in her column on The Guardian in her article "How artificial wombs will change our ideas of gender, family and equality" that "It will [...] give men an essential tool to have a child entirely without a woman, should they choose. It will ask us to question concepts of gender and parenthood." She furthermore argues for the benefits for same-sex couples: "It might also mean that the divide between mother and father can be dispensed with: a womb outside a woman’s body would serve women, trans women and male same-sex couples equally without prejudice."[35]
I always feel sorry for women who discount reproduction from their life goals and fail to recognize how empowering motherhood can be. A full-on 90% of the problem-solving, compassion, and humanity I have came into my life through motherhood.
They all need Jesus. Within that identity perhaps they could learn to appreciate how God's creation of complementary sexes is astounding.
Very well put.
WTAF is this pile of shit!?!? Reproductive biology is tyranny? 🙄