It does not need to be targeted to a synagogue. The use of the symbol towards a jewish or non-jewish person OR places like synagogues also elevates it to a "hate crime." Line 95 and 96 cover this.
This type of language actually stokes anti-israeli propaganda more than it inhibits it. The law should not have specific carve outs like this. If you want to make acts of religious hate additional crimes, then do so equally, and absolutely avoid mentioning any one specific religion.
Easy to avoid while still accomplishing the same goals.
Yes, and a stance like yours doesn't mean you advocate for doing any of that.
I understand why these people are doing it, and it stems directly from this behavior. It's something to show off to friends, it makes them "famous", it gives them entertainment when the media rolls over back and forth on how awful it is.
But vandalism is also wrong, so that shouldn't be done.
I prefer to treat people with respect when they deserve it, and I have long stood against the muh Jews sentiment, although I have participated in offensive jokes specifically because it gets a rise out of people.
Normal folk just want to see equality, not equity.
I agree and was going to post similar after reading the bill. There is nothing against having or distributing Bibles in that bill. You just can't go onto private property and harass.
I made an account to day this but I've lurked a long time.
While True it only serves as a modifier it is a dangerous precedent to let stand as it legally acknowledges the Bible as anti-semetic.
It's reminds me of gun registration, "we don't want to bam guns, but we would like a detailed list of every gun, also please put a check box beside them."
Leaving it open to discussion for now, but I'm reading the bill here:
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2023/269/BillText/Filed/PDF
If I follow correctly, the antiemetic language is a modifier to property damage/defacement/graffiti type activity.
If you are upset that you can no longer spray paint "mah joos killed jesus" on a synagogue, I'm having a hard time siding with you.
Please keep things civil, reasonable, and factual, or it will be treated as forum sliding.
It does not need to be targeted to a synagogue. The use of the symbol towards a jewish or non-jewish person OR places like synagogues also elevates it to a "hate crime." Line 95 and 96 cover this.
This type of language actually stokes anti-israeli propaganda more than it inhibits it. The law should not have specific carve outs like this. If you want to make acts of religious hate additional crimes, then do so equally, and absolutely avoid mentioning any one specific religion.
Easy to avoid while still accomplishing the same goals.
Yes, and a stance like yours doesn't mean you advocate for doing any of that.
I understand why these people are doing it, and it stems directly from this behavior. It's something to show off to friends, it makes them "famous", it gives them entertainment when the media rolls over back and forth on how awful it is.
But vandalism is also wrong, so that shouldn't be done.
I prefer to treat people with respect when they deserve it, and I have long stood against the muh Jews sentiment, although I have participated in offensive jokes specifically because it gets a rise out of people.
Normal folk just want to see equality, not equity.
I agree and was going to post similar after reading the bill. There is nothing against having or distributing Bibles in that bill. You just can't go onto private property and harass.
I made an account to day this but I've lurked a long time.
While True it only serves as a modifier it is a dangerous precedent to let stand as it legally acknowledges the Bible as anti-semetic.
It's reminds me of gun registration, "we don't want to bam guns, but we would like a detailed list of every gun, also please put a check box beside them."
so in reality, they are acting like this is the "don't say gay bill?
I will never get those 5 minuts back,
but to your point, within 1 paragraph, I know the TRUTH.
Does this apply to abortion clinics, how about pro life offices?